Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collection --skill product-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collectionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nimadorostkar/claude-skills-collection/product-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nimadorostkar/claude-skills-collection/product-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nimadorostkar/claude-skills-collection/product-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nimadorostkar/claude-skills-collection/product-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nimadorostkar/claude-skills-collection/product-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.01354 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00677 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00271 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00135 |
Grade A, and why
product-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 128 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Product Analysis
Purpose
Understand how a product is actually used and decide what to do about it. The failure mode is a dashboard full of numbers that go up, none of which are connected to whether the product is working.
When to Use
- Deciding what to build next.
- A metric moved and nobody knows why.
- Assessing whether a feature worked.
- Setting up product analytics.
Capabilities
- Metric selection: the one that matters versus the ones that flatter.
- Funnel analysis and drop-off diagnosis.
- Retention and cohort analysis.
- Feature-adoption measurement.
- Prioritization on evidence.
Inputs
- Usage data, at the event level.
- What the product is meant to do for the user.
- The decision this analysis informs.
Outputs
- The metric that actually reflects value, and where it stands.
- The specific point of failure in the funnel, or the specific cohort that churns.
- A prioritized recommendation.
Workflow
- Choose the metric that reflects value received — Not signups, not page views, not "engagement". What is the action that means the user got what they came for? That is the metric.
- Look at retention before acquisition — A product with a leaking bucket does not need more water. If week-4 retention is 8%, acquisition spend is being poured into a hole.
- Segment before concluding — An aggregate number hides everything. A flat retention curve can be two cohorts: one that retains at 60% and one at 2%. Those require completely different responses.
- Find the drop-off, then find out why — The funnel tells you where users leave. It never tells you why. That requires session recordings, support tickets, or asking them.
- Distinguish a movement from noise — A 6% week-on-week change on a small base is noise. Before declaring a trend, check whether the change exceeds the normal variance.
- Recommend something specific — With the expected impact and how you will know if it worked.
Best Practices
- Vanity metrics go up regardless of whether the product works. Total registered users, cumulative page views, and total revenue since launch can only increase. If a metric cannot go down, it cannot tell you anything.
- Retention is the product metric. Everything else — acquisition, activation, revenue — is downstream of whether people come back.
- A cohort retention curve that flattens has found product-market fit for that cohort. One that goes to zero has not, regardless of how good the early numbers look.
- The aggregate hides the answer. Always segment: by acquisition channel, by cohort, by use case, by company size.
- A funnel identifies where users leave. It cannot tell you why, and guessing at the why is how teams ship the wrong fix.
- Before acting on a change, check whether it is larger than the week-to-week noise. Most "the metric moved" investigations are investigations of noise.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 128 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 6ffa22a2934f
product-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collection (26 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,354 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
offensive-crypto-attacks
Systematic methodology for identifying and exploiting cryptographic implementation weaknesses in real-world applications. Covers padding oracle attacks against CBC-mode ciphers with PKCS7 padding (Vaudenay's original attack through modern padbuster automation), ECB mode exploitation including block cut-and-paste and…
offensive-c2-frameworks
Command and Control framework deployment, configuration, and operational tradecraft for red team engagements. Covers Cobalt Strike (malleable C2 profiles, Beacon types HTTP/HTTPS/DNS/SMB, Beacon Object Files for in-memory execution, sleep and jitter tuning, named pipe pivoting), Sliver (implant generation across…
offensive-parameter-pollution
HTTP parameter pollution (HPP) checklist: duplicate parameter injection, backend vs frontend parsing differences, WAF bypass via HPP, server-side vs client-side HPP, and practical exploitation patterns. Use when testing web applications for parameter handling flaws.
offensive-wifi
Wireless / 802.11 attack methodology for red team engagements and wireless security assessments. Covers monitor-mode setup, WPA/WPA2-PSK handshake capture and PMKID attacks, WPA3 SAE downgrade and Dragonblood, WPA-Enterprise (EAP) attacks (MSCHAPv2 cracking, EAP-TLS cert theft, evil-twin RADIUS), Karma / Known Beacons…
offensive-z-wave
Z-Wave attack methodology — sniffing with Z-Force / EZ-Wave / RTL-SDR + ZniffMobile, S0 (legacy) network-key derivation flaw and key reuse, S2 (modern) ECDH commissioning analysis, replay/injection on unauthenticated nodes, default-key brute-force on test deployments, and home-automation hub pivots. Use when targeting…
seo
Optimize for search engine visibility and ranking. Use when asked to "improve SEO", "optimize for search", "fix meta tags", "add structured data", "sitemap optimization", or "search engine optimization".