Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nimble-giant/nimble-mold --skill pr-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nimble-giant/nimble-moldWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nimble-giant/nimble-mold/pr-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nimble-giant/nimble-mold/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nimble-giant/nimble-mold/pr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nimble-giant/nimble-mold/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nimble-giant/nimble-mold/pr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00873 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00436 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00175 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
pr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 147 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PR Review
Purpose
This command helps reviewers conduct comprehensive code reviews efficiently. It analyzes PR changes, generates review feedback, and can either output a markdown review file (silent mode) or post comments directly to the PR (interactive mode with plan approval).
Command Name
pr-review
Invocation Syntax
/pr-review <pr-number> [--silent-mode|-s] [--focus=<area>]
/pr-review <pr-url> [--silent-mode|-s] [--focus=<area>]
/pr-review [--silent-mode|-s] [--focus=<area>]
Examples:
# Silent mode (default) - generates markdown review file
/pr-review 1234
/pr-review 1234 --silent-mode
/pr-review 1234 -s
# Interactive mode - posts comments to PR after plan approval
/pr-review 1234 --silent-mode=false
# Focus on specific areas
/pr-review 1234 --focus=security
/pr-review 1234 --focus=performance
/pr-review 1234 --focus=testing
# Auto-detect current PR
/pr-review --silent-mode=false
Flags:
--silent-mode/-s: Generate markdown review file only (default: true)--silent-mode=false: Interactive mode with plan approval and PR commenting--focus=<area>: Focus review on specific areas (security, performance, testing, architecture, etc.)
Workflow Overview
Execute this workflow when the command is invoked:
- Parse Flags: Determine silent mode and focus areas
- Fetch PR Information: Get PR details, diff, and context
- Analyze Code Changes: Comprehensive code review analysis
- Generate Review: Create structured review feedback
- Output Mode: Either save markdown file (silent) or enter plan mode (interactive)
Phase 1: Flag Parsing and Setup
Step 1.1: Parse Command Flags
Default behavior: --silent-mode=true
// Parse user input for flags
const flags = {
silentMode: true, // Default to silent mode
focus: null, // No specific focus by default
prNumber: null,
prUrl: null
};
// Check for explicit flags in user input
if (input.includes('--silent-mode=false')) flags.silentMode = false;
if (input.includes('--focus=')) flags.focus = extractFocusArea(input);
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 147 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 74d574418ade
pr-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository nimble-giant/nimble-mold (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 873 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…