pr-review

pr-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from nimble-giant/nimble-mold. It costs 53 tokens per session (873 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A code-review command for checking the changes in a pull request, which is a proposed code update for merging into a project. It can write a Markdown report or, after approval, post comments on the pull request.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review a pull request by number or URL, review the current pull request, or produce focused feedback in a selected area.
Why use it?
It helps find problems in proposed changes without manually checking every changed line. You can also limit the review to security, performance, or testing.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to review a pull request by number or URL, review the current pull request, or produce focused feedback in a selected area.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/nimble-giant/nimble-mold/pr-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add nimble-giant/nimble-mold --skill pr-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nimble-giant/nimble-mold

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for pr-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nimble-giant/nimble-mold/pr-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nimble-giant/nimble-mold/pr-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nimble-giant/nimble-mold/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nimble-giant/nimble-mold/pr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for pr-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nimble-giant/nimble-mold/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nimble-giant/nimble-mold/pr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 53 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 873 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00053 $0.00873
Opus 5.5 $0.00021 $0.00349
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00175
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00087

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 74d574418ade, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

pr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/pr-review/SKILL.md · 147 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 147 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

PR Review

Purpose

This command helps reviewers conduct comprehensive code reviews efficiently. It analyzes PR changes, generates review feedback, and can either output a markdown review file (silent mode) or post comments directly to the PR (interactive mode with plan approval).

Command Name

pr-review

Invocation Syntax

/pr-review <pr-number> [--silent-mode|-s] [--focus=<area>]
/pr-review <pr-url> [--silent-mode|-s] [--focus=<area>]
/pr-review [--silent-mode|-s] [--focus=<area>]

Examples:

# Silent mode (default) - generates markdown review file
/pr-review 1234
/pr-review 1234 --silent-mode
/pr-review 1234 -s

# Interactive mode - posts comments to PR after plan approval
/pr-review 1234 --silent-mode=false

# Focus on specific areas
/pr-review 1234 --focus=security
/pr-review 1234 --focus=performance
/pr-review 1234 --focus=testing

# Auto-detect current PR
/pr-review --silent-mode=false

Flags:

  • --silent-mode / -s: Generate markdown review file only (default: true)
  • --silent-mode=false: Interactive mode with plan approval and PR commenting
  • --focus=<area>: Focus review on specific areas (security, performance, testing, architecture, etc.)

Workflow Overview

Execute this workflow when the command is invoked:

  1. Parse Flags: Determine silent mode and focus areas
  2. Fetch PR Information: Get PR details, diff, and context
  3. Analyze Code Changes: Comprehensive code review analysis
  4. Generate Review: Create structured review feedback
  5. Output Mode: Either save markdown file (silent) or enter plan mode (interactive)

Phase 1: Flag Parsing and Setup

Step 1.1: Parse Command Flags

Default behavior: --silent-mode=true

// Parse user input for flags
const flags = {
  silentMode: true,  // Default to silent mode
  focus: null,       // No specific focus by default
  prNumber: null,
  prUrl: null
};

// Check for explicit flags in user input
if (input.includes('--silent-mode=false')) flags.silentMode = false;
if (input.includes('--focus=')) flags.focus = extractFocusArea(input);

Read the full file on GitHub · 147 lines

Files

What ships with it

6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 147 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 74d574418ade

Subscribe to this mod's changes

pr-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository nimble-giant/nimble-mold (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 873 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens

asplos-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 65 tokens