Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Nimrobo/superdense --skill outcome-rungit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Nimrobo/superdenseWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nimrobo/superdense/outcome-run)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nimrobo/superdense/outcome-run"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nimrobo/superdense/outcome-run/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nimrobo/superdense/outcome-run"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nimrobo/superdense/outcome-run.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.01353 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00541 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00271 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00135 |
Grade A, and why
outcome-run scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 62 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Outcome Run
Run one action for one outcome folder. An action is one concrete step on a lever, whether a rep of a proven recipe or a fix to something in the path. The run folder records work references and learning; Superdense records durable sessions, artifacts, externalization targets, and reward snapshots.
Read references/outcome-loop.md and references/preflight.md before starting.
Workflow
- Locate the outcome folder and read
goal.md,run.md, andgate.md. If any are missing, stop and useoutcome-setupto repair the folder contract. - Start with the bounded reward preflight.
references/preflight.mdis the full job specification:- Spawn a bounded subagent when the runtime supports it and the invocation permits subagents.
- Prefer a lower-cost or lower-reasoning subagent only when it is still capable of correct, bounded maintenance.
- If subagents are unavailable, run the same preflight locally.
- Run the preflight per
references/preflight.md, filling in<outcome-folder>. It plans the maintenance pipeline with onesuperdense reward next --project <id> --items 10call, advances each returned step in one bounded batch up to the budgeted item count, and returns a compact evidence packet.reward nextretires matured targets itself (linked and non-located) and returns the project name and roots, so no separate retire call is needed. It stays on already-external active targets and the current run; it does not drain the internal backlog. - Refresh the lever portfolio in
run.mdfrom the evidence packet when the evidence clearly changes pull count, reward summary, uncertainty, last-pulled, status, or Pareto-best dimension. Do not flatten multidimensional reward into one scalar. - Render due experiment verdicts with
superdense experiment verdict <id>when target reps are met and the reward window is mature. Surface refuted hypotheses withsuperdense hypothesis list --project <project-id> --status refutedas "what not to try" before choosing a new action. - Surface comparable cohorts and version chains yourself — this is the run agent's job, not the preflight's. Start with
superdense cohort list --project <project-id> --by typeand inspect relevant version chains; keep it compact and project-scoped. Use them to inform the next action. - Use
goal.md,run.md,gate.md, open hypotheses/experiments, refuted hypotheses, cohort/chain comparison, and the evidence packet to choose exactly one action unless the user explicitly asks for exploration only. First setMode: exploreorMode: exploitfrom the Selection Policy. - For
explore, record a structured falsifiable hypothesis withsuperdense hypothesis recordunless an open suitable hypothesis already exists. Open or extend an experiment withsuperdense experiment openand latersuperdense experiment add-member. Forexploit, cite the supported hypothesis and experiment that justify the proven lever. - Create
runs/<run-id>/using a stable date-plus-slug id. Use the## Run Record Templateinrun.mdas the source of truth. Write:work.mdlearnings.md
- Execute the action in the correct surface:
- for content outcomes, the run folder may contain drafts or final copy,
- for product outcomes, edit the target repo and record branch, PR, deploy, event names, and session IDs in
work.md.
- After the shipped artifact exists or the run has a stable artifact id, attach the run/artifact to the experiment with
superdense experiment add-member. RecordMode,Hypothesis id, andExperiment idinwork.md. - Before completion, apply
gate.md:
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 62 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 471227bc901d
outcome-run is a skill published in the GitHub repository Nimrobo/superdense (93 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 1,353 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
caveman
Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts output tokens 65% (measured) by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra, wenyan-lite, wenyan-full, wenyan-ultra. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens"…
brain-page
Operating manual for reading and writing a project's brain — every read and write goes through the bundled zero-dependency brain CLI; never hand-edit brain files. Read it before creating or modifying any page or root page.
brain-setup
Bootstrap the Open Project Brain Standard into the current project — prefer brain init (ensure BRAIN.md, scaffold empty brain brainRoot-aware, default-wire CLAUDE.md + AGENTS.md). Optionally install a pre-commit hook and a Claude Code or Codex SessionStart hook.
brain-bootstrap
Seed a freshly-scaffolded brain with real project knowledge — on an existing (brownfield) project read the code, docs, and git log, then draft only the root pages that have meaningful content and capture key historical decisions; on a near-empty (greenfield) project interview the user. Every write goes through the…
brain-ingest
The process for digesting a conversation, document, or research result, classifying it, and writing it down as brain content (a root-page update or a new/updated page) through the brain CLI.
day-log
Quick timestamped log entry — no conversation, just capture.