Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nirelbaz/promptpit --skill reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nirelbaz/promptpitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nirelbaz/promptpit/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nirelbaz/promptpit/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nirelbaz/promptpit/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nirelbaz/promptpit/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nirelbaz/promptpit/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00325 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00162 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00065 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review
Review your own changes before pushing. Catch the things you'd be embarrassed about in a PR review.
Process
- Run
git diff(unstaged) andgit diff --cached(staged) to see all changes - Check each file against the checklist below
- Report findings grouped by severity: must-fix, should-fix, nit
Checklist
Must-fix (block the push)
- Leftover debug code: console.log, debugger, print statements, TODO comments related to the current change
- Hardcoded secrets, API keys, passwords, or connection strings
- Obvious bugs: wrong variable name, inverted condition, missing return
- Broken imports or references to deleted code
Should-fix (fix before PR review)
- Missing error handling on I/O operations (file reads, API calls, database queries)
- New code without tests
- Functions longer than 40 lines
- Duplicated logic that should be extracted
- Unclear variable or function names
Nit (note but don't block)
- Inconsistent formatting with surrounding code
- Comments that state the obvious
- Unused imports or variables
Output
For each finding, show: file, line, severity, what's wrong, and a suggested fix. If everything looks clean, say so.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 40 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 9f80036b051f
review is a skill published in the GitHub repository nirelbaz/promptpit (6 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 325 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
cn-check
Install and run the Continue CLI (cn) to execute AI agent checks on local code changes. Use when asked to "run checks", "lint with AI", "review my changes with cn", or set up Continue CI locally.
gentle-ai-collab-perfect
Trigger: contributing to Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai as an external collaborator. Strict issue-first workflow, honest PR bodies, contributor-vs-maintainer scope, chained-PR strategy, verification protocol, docstring coverage. Load whenever the active repo is Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai and any part of the…
branch-pr
Create Gentle AI pull requests with issue-first checks. Trigger: creating, opening, or preparing PRs for review.
work-unit-commits
Plan commits as reviewable work units. Trigger: implementation, commit splitting, chained PRs, or keeping tests and docs with code.
git
Git and code hosting platform management — GitHub, GitLab, Codeberg, Forgejo. Zero barrier — install x-cmd and manage repos from the terminal. Use for "git", "github", "gitlab", "repo", "pull request", "code hosting".
chained-pr
Trigger: PRs over 400 lines, stacked PRs, review slices. Split oversized changes into chained PRs that protect review focus.