Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/nishilbhave/codeprobe/codeprobe-error-handlingnpx skills add nishilbhave/codeprobe --skill codeprobe-error-handlinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nishilbhave/codeprobeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nishilbhave/codeprobe/codeprobe-error-handling)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nishilbhave/codeprobe/codeprobe-error-handling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nishilbhave/codeprobe/codeprobe-error-handling.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00090 | $0.01971 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00045 | $0.00986 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00394 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00197 |
Grade A, and why
codeprobe-error-handling scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 118 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Standalone Mode
If invoked directly (not via the orchestrator), you must first:
- Read
../codeprobe/shared-preamble.md(resolve relative to this SKILL.md's location — the siblingcodeprobeskill directory — not the user's project) for the output contract, execution modes, and constraints. - Load applicable reference files from
../codeprobe/references/(same resolution) based on the project's tech stack. - Default to
fullmode unless the user specifies otherwise.
Error Handling & Resilience Checker
Domain Scope
This sub-skill detects error handling and resilience issues across these categories:
- Swallowed Exceptions — Empty catch blocks, catch-and-log-only without rethrow/handle
- Missing Error Handling — External API calls without try/catch, unhandled promise rejections
- Error Information — Generic error messages, leaking internals, missing structured responses
- Retry & Circuit Breaker — No timeout on external calls, no retry for transient failures
- Validation — Missing input validation, implicit null assumptions, type coercion bugs
- Transaction Safety — Multi-step DB operations without transactions, missing rollback
- Logging — No logging on critical paths, missing correlation IDs
What It Does NOT Flag
- Sensitive data in logs — covered by
codeprobe-security(SECprefix). This sub-skill flags missing logging and structural issues like no correlation IDs, not data leakage. - Test files — test exception handling follows different patterns and is expected to be simpler.
- Framework-generated exception handlers (e.g., Laravel's
Handler.php, Next.js error boundaries that are intentionally minimal) — these are scaffolded defaults, not developer oversights. - CLI scripts with intentionally simple error handling (print + exit) — command-line tools often use a valid pattern of printing an error and exiting with a non-zero code.
- Catch blocks that deliberately swallow specific known-harmless exceptions with a comment explaining why — if the developer documented the rationale, respect the decision.
- Issues that are primarily security vulnerabilities (e.g., authentication bypasses, injection, data exposure) even if they also have error handling implications — these are covered by
codeprobe-security. If both sub-skills flag the same location, the orchestrator will deduplicate and keep the security finding as primary.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 118 lines · 90 tokens per session scan A 5948d9088477
codeprobe-error-handling is a skill published in the GitHub repository nishilbhave/codeprobe (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 90 tokens to every session and 1,971 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…