code-review

code-review is a skill for Claude Code from nitinjain999/platform-skills. It costs 88 tokens per session (1,207 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A pull-request review guide for a repository that teaches platform engineering, including Kubernetes, Terraform, cloud services, and GitHub Actions. It checks changes for technical correctness, security, consistency, and completeness.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review pull requests that change commands, reference guides, examples, or platform skills, including claims about scripts, workflows, APIs, and configuration.
Why use it?
It helps catch incorrect vendor details, outdated tools, insecure configurations, and differences between code and its documentation before users copy the examples.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: mentions .claude-plugin; mentions CLAUDE.md; mentions Claude Code.

Part of the platform-skills plugin — 53 skills, 1 agent shipped together

Good fit Use it to review pull requests that change commands, reference guides, examples, or platform skills, including claims about scripts, workflows, APIs, and configuration.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/nitinjain999/platform-skills/code-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add nitinjain999/platform-skills --skill code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nitinjain999/platform-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install platform-skills, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 53 skills, 1 agent.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nitinjain999/platform-skills/code-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nitinjain999/platform-skills/code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nitinjain999/platform-skills/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nitinjain999/platform-skills/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nitinjain999/platform-skills/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nitinjain999/platform-skills/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 88 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,207 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00088 $0.01207
Opus 5.5 $0.00035 $0.00483
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00018 $0.00241
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00121

Measured yesterday against content hash 3e69114f1d8b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.github/skills/code-review/SKILL.md · 39 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 39 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

This repo teaches platform engineering patterns (Kubernetes, Terraform, GitHub Actions, AWS, Azure, GitOps, secrets management, and related domains) as slash commands, reference guides, and worked examples. Review every PR against the priorities below, in order — correctness and security outrank style every time.

1. Correctness first

  • Don't take a vendor API, SDK method, config schema, or CLI flag on faith — verify it against the vendor's actual current docs before approving a claim about it. A wrong schema in this repo doesn't just break a build once; every user who copies the example inherits the bug. If the PR can't be independently verified from the diff alone, say so explicitly rather than approving on trust.
  • If a PR claims a behavior ("fails open", "fails closed", "denies", "logs X") for a script or workflow, trace the actual code path rather than trusting the prose describing it. Doc drift between what code does and what a comment/reference says it does is a common, real defect class here — flag it as a correctness issue, not a nitpick.
  • Flag deprecated APIs, deprecated action versions, and end-of-life tool versions by name.

2. Security

  • No wildcard IAM actions ("*") or wildcard resources (Resource: "*") without an explicit justification comment. Push for scoped ARNs and explicit action lists.
  • GitHub Actions: uses: steps pinned to a full commit SHA (not a floating tag) unless the PR explicitly documents why not yet (e.g. "pin before use" on a new example). Least-privilege permissions: blocks — flag a job-level write scope that only one step needs.
  • Any workflow step that interpolates ${{ github.* }} directly into a run: shell block is a template-injection risk — it must be bound to an env: var first and referenced as a quoted shell variable.
  • Secrets: no hardcoded credentials, no logging of raw secret values, and any new audit/log-writing code must state what it excludes (raw command text, tokens, etc.) — silence on this point is a gap, not a default-safe assumption.

Read the full file on GitHub · 39 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 39 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A 3e69114f1d8b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository nitinjain999/platform-skills (70 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 1,207 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-18.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

skill-distiller

Fetches top-rated skills from skills.sh, analyzes them, and synthesizes one token-efficient skill combining the best elements. Use when the user asks to "distill skills for X", "find and combine skills for X", "synthesize skills", "merge skills", "make a skill for X from skills.sh", "update distilled skill", or…

iliaal/whetstone · 91 tokens

python-services

Python patterns for CLI tools, async parallelism, and backend services. Use when building CLI apps, async/parallel Python, FastAPI services, background jobs, or configuring Python project tooling (uv, ruff, ty).

iliaal/whetstone · 48 tokens

react-frontend

React, TypeScript, and Next.js patterns for frontend development. Use when building React components, managing state, fetching data, optimizing performance, or working with Next.js App Router. Covers React 18-19, hooks, Server Components, and type-safe patterns.

iliaal/whetstone · 57 tokens

nodejs-backend

Node.js backend patterns: framework selection, layered architecture, TypeScript, validation, error handling, security, production deployment. Use when building REST APIs, Express/Fastify servers, microservices, or server-side TypeScript.

iliaal/whetstone · 50 tokens

tailwind-css

Tailwind CSS v4 patterns: CSS-first config, utility classes, component variants, v3 migration. Use when styling with Tailwind, configuring @theme tokens, using tailwind-variants/CVA, migrating v3 to v4, or fixing Tailwind styles and dark mode.

iliaal/whetstone · 61 tokens

terraform

Terraform and OpenTofu configuration, modules, testing, state management, and HCL review. Use for "terraform module", "terraform test", "infrastructure as code", "IaC", "HCL", "tfvars", "terraform plan", "terraform apply", "OpenTofu", "tftest", or multi-environment patterns.

iliaal/whetstone · 73 tokens