Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nitinjain999/platform-skills --skill composite-actionsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nitinjain999/platform-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nitinjain999/platform-skills/composite-actions)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nitinjain999/platform-skills/composite-actions"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nitinjain999/platform-skills/composite-actions/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nitinjain999/platform-skills/composite-actions"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nitinjain999/platform-skills/composite-actions.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.04961 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.01984 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00992 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00496 |
Grade A, and why
composite-actions scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 575 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Composite Actions Command
Generate production-ready composite GitHub Actions or audit existing ones against best practices.
Activation
/platform-skills:composite-actions generate # interview → full repo scaffold → optional PR
/platform-skills:composite-actions review # audit an existing action.yml
/platform-skills:composite-actions secure # harden an action in place
/platform-skills:composite-actions test # generate a test workflow + act commands
Mode: generate
Triggers: generate, create, new action, scaffold, write action, build action
Run a guided interview, then generate a complete, production-ready composite action with all supporting files. If the target repo already exists, open a PR.
Interview — ask these questions in order
Step 1 — Purpose
What does this action do? Describe it in one or two sentences. (e.g. "Build a Docker image and push it to GHCR using OIDC", "Send a Slack notification with build status and PR link")
Derive the action name from the description (kebab-case, under 30 chars). Confirm with the user.
Step 2 — Repo destination
Where should this action live?
- New dedicated repo — best for shared/public actions (Marketplace-publishable)
- Existing repo — internal action, placed under
.github/actions/<name>/oractions/<name>/
If existing repo: ask for owner/repo. Verify it exists with gh repo view owner/repo. Then ask:
Which subdirectory? (default:
.github/actions/<action-name>)
If the repo exists and is accessible, the action will be created on a branch and a PR will be opened automatically.
Step 3 — Pinning strategy
How should external actions be pinned?
- SHA pinning (recommended — supply chain secure, immutable)
- Semver floating tag (e.g.
@v4— easier to maintain, lower security)
Resolve SHAs for all external actions used via gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/git/refs/tags/{tag} if SHA pinning is chosen.
Step 4 — Inputs
What inputs does this action need? For each input, collect:
- Name (snake_case)
- Type:
string/boolean/choice- Required or optional?
- If optional: default value
- Is it a secret? (webhook URL, kubeconfig, token, password, API key)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +5 lines 2379a4a947a5
- 7d ago First seen · 570 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 288df13c0918
composite-actions is a skill published in the GitHub repository nitinjain999/platform-skills (70 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 4,961 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-12.
Other skills, from other repositories
aw-author
Author, validate, and improve GitHub Agentic Workflow (gh-aw) markdown files. Use when the user wants to create a new workflow, validate an existing workflow, improve a workflow, or debug workflow issues. Triggers on: "aw-author", "agentic workflow", "gh-aw workflow", "workflow markdown", "workflow frontmatter"…
devops
Use when setting up CI/CD pipelines, deploying applications, managing cloud infrastructure (AWS, GCP, Azure), implementing monitoring, containerizing services, or automating deployments with infrastructure as code.
complete-infra
Complete infrastructure task — lint, validate, review, and submit PR. Use when an infrastructure-only branch is ready for submission — runs Terraform/Helm validation and creates the PR, skipping application/frontend checks.
infra-plan
Plan infrastructure changes — Terraform modules, Helm charts, CI/CD pipelines. Use when the user wants to add or modify cloud infrastructure, Kubernetes resources, or deployment pipelines.
infrastructure-planning
Plan and document the required software, infrastructure, and logistics for a Paperclip company — domains, GitHub, Docker Hub, Kubernetes, Slack, Google Workspace, Stripe, shipping providers, and CI/CD pipelines. Use when setting up infrastructure for a new company or auditing what an existing company needs.
operating-github-ci-fixer
Use when the user asks OpenSRE to fix failing GitHub CI, GitHub Actions checks, failing pull request checks, a broken PR branch, or CI on a named branch such as main.