orchestrate-agent-architecture

orchestrate-agent-architecture is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from NITISH-R-G/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills. It costs 101 tokens per session (1,814 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

Guidance for designing an AI agent for an Orchestrate-style coding challenge. It explains how an agent loop lets the model choose its next action instead of following a fixed decision tree.

In plain words
What is it for?
Planning tool boundaries, prompts, agent loops, and implementation choices that make the agent's decision-making visible in the code.
Why use it?
It helps prevent building a scripted workflow that may work correctly but fail an evaluation looking for genuine agent behaviour.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Good fit Planning tool boundaries, prompts, agent loops, and implementation choices that make the agent's decision-making visible in the code.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/nitish-r-g/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills/orchestrate-agent-architecture
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add NITISH-R-G/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills --skill orchestrate-agent-architecture
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NITISH-R-G/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for orchestrate-agent-architecture

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nitish-r-g/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills/orchestrate-agent-architecture/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nitish-r-g/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills/orchestrate-agent-architecture)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nitish-r-g/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills/orchestrate-agent-architecture"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nitish-r-g/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills/orchestrate-agent-architecture/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for orchestrate-agent-architecture

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nitish-r-g/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills/orchestrate-agent-architecture"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nitish-r-g/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills/orchestrate-agent-architecture.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 101 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,814 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00101 $0.01814
Opus 5 $0.00051 $0.00907
Sonnet 5 $0.00020 $0.00363
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00181

Measured 10d ago against content hash f6e9a5d99c3d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

orchestrate-agent-architecture scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/orchestrate-agent-architecture/SKILL.md · 102 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Orchestrate Agent Architecture

HackerRank's own description of the code rubric is unusually specific and worth quoting directly: it measures "whether submissions contain actual agent loops versus hardcoded workflows." That is a stated, explicit discriminator. It's also the single easiest place to lose 30% of your score while producing something that technically works.

The hardcoded-workflow trap

Under time pressure the tempting shape is:

for ticket in tickets:
    category = classify(ticket)          # one LLM call
    if category == "billing":
        urgency = check_billing_rules(ticket)
    elif category == "technical":
        urgency = check_tech_rules(ticket)
    ...
    if urgency > THRESHOLD:
        escalate(ticket)
    else:
        respond(ticket)

This can score well on raw correctness and still read as a decision tree with LLM calls embedded in it, not an agent. Every branch was decided by you, at authoring time. The model fills in blanks; it doesn't decide anything about how to approach the problem.

What an actual agent loop looks like

The distinguishing property: the model decides what to do next, and the loop continues until the model says it's done — rather than the control flow being fixed in advance by the author.

def run_agent(ticket, tools, max_steps=10):
    messages = [system_prompt(), user_prompt(ticket)]
    for step in range(max_steps):
        response = model.call(messages, tools=tools)
        if response.is_final_answer:
            return response.answer
        result = execute_tool(response.tool_call)   # agent chose this tool
        messages.append(response)
        messages.append(result)
    return fallback(messages)   # hit step limit — handle explicitly

The agent chose: which tool, with which arguments, how many times, and when to stop. That's the thing being scored.

This is not an argument for maximum autonomy. A loop that wanders for 40 steps is worse than a tight pipeline. The point is that the structure should let the model make decisions where judgment is genuinely required, with bounded steps and explicit fallbacks — not that you should remove all structure.

Read the full file on GitHub · 102 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 102 lines · 101 tokens per session scan A f6e9a5d99c3d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

orchestrate-agent-architecture is a skill published in the GitHub repository NITISH-R-G/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills (3 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 101 tokens to every session and 1,814 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

general

Handle everyday conversation, answer questions, manage files, take notes, run scripts, and maintain persistent memory across sessions. Use when the user asks a general question, requests file operations, wants to brainstorm ideas, needs to-do tracking, asks you to remember something, or requests skill search and…

0xranx/golembot · 61 tokens

multi-bot

Coordinates responses between multiple GolemBot instances in a shared fleet. Use when the bot operates in a group chat with other bots, needs to decide whether to respond or pass, or must call a peer bot's API to fetch cross-domain data.

0xranx/golembot · 53 tokens

kb-guide

Search, read, create, and update knowledge base entries via MCP-connected KB tools. Use when the user asks to look up documentation, find existing articles, check if docs exist on a topic, create a new KB entry, update an existing document, or when domain questions should be answered from the knowledge base first.

0xranx/golembot · 66 tokens

ops

Content operations assistant — drafts blog posts, social media copy, and marketing materials, compiles data briefings, and tracks competitor activity. Use when the user asks to write a blog post, draft social media content, create marketing copy, generate a weekly report, compile operational metrics, update the…

0xranx/golembot · 67 tokens

escalation

Escalate unresolvable or sensitive requests to a human agent by recording an escalation entry. Use when the user asks to speak to a human, the bot cannot answer confidently, the request involves financial, legal, or security concerns, a safety issue is detected, or the user is frustrated after repeated failures.

0xranx/golembot · 66 tokens

code-review

Reviews code changes, pull requests, and diffs for correctness, security, performance, and style. Use when the user submits a PR for review, asks to review a diff or code snippet, or requests a quality check on recent changes.

0xranx/golembot · 51 tokens