Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add NITISH-R-G/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills --skill orchestrate-phase-gatesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NITISH-R-G/hackerrank-orchestrate-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nitish-r-g/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills/orchestrate-phase-gates)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nitish-r-g/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills/orchestrate-phase-gates"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nitish-r-g/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills/orchestrate-phase-gates/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nitish-r-g/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills/orchestrate-phase-gates"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nitish-r-g/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills/orchestrate-phase-gates.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00116 | $0.01187 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00058 | $0.00593 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00237 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00119 |
Grade A, and why
orchestrate-phase-gates scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 67 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Orchestrate Phase Gates
HackerRank Orchestrate scores four independent artifacts, and the published post-mortem of the May 2026 event found that no single metric reproduced the leaderboard — the winners were balanced across all four, not exceptional at one. That single fact should drive your entire time allocation, because the instinct under time pressure is to sink everything into code and treat the other three as afterthoughts. That is the losing strategy, mathematically: code is only 30%.
The scored surface (from HackerRank's published breakdown)
| Artifact | Weight | What it actually measures |
|---|---|---|
| Code zip | 30% | Agent design, architecture, tool integration, prompt quality, robustness, engineering standards |
| Output CSV | 30% | Functional correctness vs. a golden dataset — and the soundness of each decision's justification |
| AI chat transcript | 10% | How you directed your AI coding tools — planning, constraints, debugging, iteration |
| AI judge interview | 30% | Technical depth, problem understanding, communication clarity, self-awareness about limitations |
Two implications people miss:
- 70% of the score is not your code. Output quality, your transcript, and a live interview dominate. Budget time accordingly — a common failure is arriving at hour 23 with elegant code, an unreviewed CSV, and no interview prep.
- Justifications are scored, not just actions. The CSV isn't a pure correctness check. A right answer with incoherent reasoning loses points that a right answer with sound reasoning keeps.
The gates
Run these in order. Each gate has an owning skill that does the actual work — this skill is the sequencer, not the executor.
Gate 0 Understand the rubric → (this skill)
Gate 1 Plan & decompose → brainstorming / writing-plans
Gate 2 Agent architecture → orchestrate-agent-architecture
Gate 3 Robustness & adversarial → orchestrate-robustness
Gate 4 Implement → tdd, implement
Gate 5 Justification quality → orchestrate-justification-quality
Gate 6 Transcript hygiene → orchestrate-ai-collaboration-transcript (runs CONTINUOUSLY, not once)
Gate 7 Self-score against rubric → orchestrate-self-scoring
Gate 8 Interview readiness → orchestrate-interview-readiness
Gate 9 Final submission review → orchestrate-submission-review
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 67 lines · 116 tokens per session scan A b919e2a05708
orchestrate-phase-gates is a skill published in the GitHub repository NITISH-R-G/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills (3 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 116 tokens to every session and 1,187 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
general
Handle everyday conversation, answer questions, manage files, take notes, run scripts, and maintain persistent memory across sessions. Use when the user asks a general question, requests file operations, wants to brainstorm ideas, needs to-do tracking, asks you to remember something, or requests skill search and…
multi-bot
Coordinates responses between multiple GolemBot instances in a shared fleet. Use when the bot operates in a group chat with other bots, needs to decide whether to respond or pass, or must call a peer bot's API to fetch cross-domain data.
kb-guide
Search, read, create, and update knowledge base entries via MCP-connected KB tools. Use when the user asks to look up documentation, find existing articles, check if docs exist on a topic, create a new KB entry, update an existing document, or when domain questions should be answered from the knowledge base first.
ops
Content operations assistant — drafts blog posts, social media copy, and marketing materials, compiles data briefings, and tracks competitor activity. Use when the user asks to write a blog post, draft social media content, create marketing copy, generate a weekly report, compile operational metrics, update the…
escalation
Escalate unresolvable or sensitive requests to a human agent by recording an escalation entry. Use when the user asks to speak to a human, the bot cannot answer confidently, the request involves financial, legal, or security concerns, a safety issue is detected, or the user is frustrated after repeated failures.
code-review
Reviews code changes, pull requests, and diffs for correctness, security, performance, and style. Use when the user submits a PR for review, asks to review a diff or code snippet, or requests a quality check on recent changes.