orchestrate-rule-engine-architect

orchestrate-rule-engine-architect is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from NITISH-R-G/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills. It costs 51 tokens per session (746 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A design guide for routing inputs with explicit rules instead of using a language model for every decision. It explains how to order, test, and document rules so the routing remains predictable and resistant to prompt injection.

In plain words
What is it for?
Choosing between rules and a model, ordering routing checks, finding rules that never run, handling structured safety signals, and deciding where a model is genuinely needed.
Why use it?
Rules are easier to audit when labels depend on structured fields or repeated patterns. Keeping message text out of decision prompts can remove a common injection path.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Choosing between rules and a model, ordering routing checks, finding rules that never run, handling structured safety signals, and deciding where a model is genuinely needed.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/nitish-r-g/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills/orchestrate-rule-engine-architect
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add NITISH-R-G/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills --skill orchestrate-rule-engine-architect
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NITISH-R-G/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for orchestrate-rule-engine-architect

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nitish-r-g/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills/orchestrate-rule-engine-architect/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nitish-r-g/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills/orchestrate-rule-engine-architect)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nitish-r-g/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills/orchestrate-rule-engine-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nitish-r-g/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills/orchestrate-rule-engine-architect/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for orchestrate-rule-engine-architect

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nitish-r-g/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills/orchestrate-rule-engine-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nitish-r-g/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills/orchestrate-rule-engine-architect.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 51 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 746 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00051 $0.00746
Opus 5 $0.00026 $0.00373
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00149
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00075

Measured 10d ago against content hash fdefe50daed5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

orchestrate-rule-engine-architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/orchestrate-rule-engine-architect/SKILL.md · 67 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 67 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Orchestrate: Rule Engine Architect

Evidence tier: first-hand build (August 2026). Grounded in a completed Orchestrate submission that was audited to destruction — 48 logged defects, 9 measured-and-rejected optimisations, 17 certification scripts. Every number below was measured on that system. Nothing here claims access to HackerRank's internal scoring.

When a rule engine beats an LLM classifier

Three conditions, all measurable before you commit:

  1. The targets are templated. In the real build, 30 labeled rows contained only 24 distinct reason strings, several repeating verbatim. Ground-truth reasons state which rule fired. A rule engine reproduces that exactly; a generative model approximates it.
  2. The dataset attacks LLM routers. One labeled row was a prompt-injection attack whose correct label was mute/scam. A rule engine is structurally immune — message text never enters a decision-making prompt.
  3. The safety-critical signals are structured data, not prose: verification flags, opt-out state, sender role, dismissal history.

The model layer earns its place only where structured data genuinely cannot reach — reading a poster, hearing a voice note.

Tier ordering is a policy statement

SAFETY  ▶  RELATIONSHIP / URGENCY  ▶  ENGAGEMENT  ▶  DEFAULT

Safety sits above engagement because the spec says risk is muted "regardless of the user's usual engagement." Ordering encodes that sentence. Write the reason in a comment next to the tier.

Two rule-level failures worth knowing

Shadowing. A rule whose condition is implied by an earlier rule's condition can never fire. Real example: a rule requiring A and B and not C sat below a rule requiring only B. Strictly unreachable — proven by implication, not sampling. It was deleted; the output hash was unchanged, which is the proof it was dead.

Contradiction. Two rules encoding opposite policies for the same situation. Real example: one rule routed a distress message from a known contact to notify, while another correctly excluded distress-plus-payment-request as a scam pattern. Patching the first would have made it dead code, so it was deleted.

Read the full file on GitHub · 67 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 67 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A fdefe50daed5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

orchestrate-rule-engine-architect is a skill published in the GitHub repository NITISH-R-G/hackerrank-orchestrate-skills (3 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 746 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

general

Handle everyday conversation, answer questions, manage files, take notes, run scripts, and maintain persistent memory across sessions. Use when the user asks a general question, requests file operations, wants to brainstorm ideas, needs to-do tracking, asks you to remember something, or requests skill search and…

0xranx/golembot · 61 tokens

multi-bot

Coordinates responses between multiple GolemBot instances in a shared fleet. Use when the bot operates in a group chat with other bots, needs to decide whether to respond or pass, or must call a peer bot's API to fetch cross-domain data.

0xranx/golembot · 53 tokens

kb-guide

Search, read, create, and update knowledge base entries via MCP-connected KB tools. Use when the user asks to look up documentation, find existing articles, check if docs exist on a topic, create a new KB entry, update an existing document, or when domain questions should be answered from the knowledge base first.

0xranx/golembot · 66 tokens

ops

Content operations assistant — drafts blog posts, social media copy, and marketing materials, compiles data briefings, and tracks competitor activity. Use when the user asks to write a blog post, draft social media content, create marketing copy, generate a weekly report, compile operational metrics, update the…

0xranx/golembot · 67 tokens

escalation

Escalate unresolvable or sensitive requests to a human agent by recording an escalation entry. Use when the user asks to speak to a human, the bot cannot answer confidently, the request involves financial, legal, or security concerns, a safety issue is detected, or the user is frustrated after repeated failures.

0xranx/golembot · 66 tokens

code-review

Reviews code changes, pull requests, and diffs for correctness, security, performance, and style. Use when the user submits a PR for review, asks to review a diff or code snippet, or requests a quality check on recent changes.

0xranx/golembot · 51 tokens