Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Njones17/AI-agent-master-cyber-skills-list --skill testing-api-for-mass-assignment-vulnerabilitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Njones17/AI-agent-master-cyber-skills-listWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/njones17/ai-agent-master-cyber-skills-list/testing-api-for-mass-assignment-vulnerability)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/njones17/ai-agent-master-cyber-skills-list/testing-api-for-mass-assignment-vulnerability"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/njones17/ai-agent-master-cyber-skills-list/testing-api-for-mass-assignment-vulnerability/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/njones17/ai-agent-master-cyber-skills-list/testing-api-for-mass-assignment-vulnerability"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/njones17/ai-agent-master-cyber-skills-list/testing-api-for-mass-assignment-vulnerability.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00114 | $0.03772 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00057 | $0.01886 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00754 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00377 |
Grade A, and why
testing-api-for-mass-assignment-vulnerability scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
baseline_user = requests.get(f"{BASE_URL}/users/me", headers=user_headers).json() The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 345 lines · 114 tokens per session scan A 52e0e3c5cbff
testing-api-for-mass-assignment-vulnerability is a skill published in the GitHub repository Njones17/AI-agent-master-cyber-skills-list (21 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 114 tokens to every session and 3,772 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
testing-api-for-mass-assignment-vulnerability
Tests APIs for mass assignment (auto-binding) vulnerabilities where clients can modify object properties they should not have access to by including additional parameters in API requests. The tester identifies writable endpoints, adds undocumented fields to request bodies (role, isAdmin, price, balance), and checks if…
testing-api-for-mass-assignment-vulnerability
Tests APIs for mass assignment (auto-binding) vulnerabilities where clients can modify object properties they should not have access to by including additional parameters in API requests. The tester identifies writable endpoints, adds undocumented fields to request bodies (role, isAdmin, price, balance), and checks if…
detecting-broken-object-property-level-authorization
Detect and test for OWASP API3:2023 Broken Object Property Level Authorization vulnerabilities including excessive data exposure and mass assignment attacks.
exploiting-broken-function-level-authorization
Tests APIs for Broken Function Level Authorization (BFLA) vulnerabilities where regular users can invoke administrative functions or access privileged API endpoints by directly calling them. The tester identifies admin and privileged endpoints, then attempts to access them with regular user credentials by manipulating…
exploiting-excessive-data-exposure-in-api
Tests APIs for excessive data exposure where endpoints return more data than the client application needs, relying on the frontend to filter sensitive fields. The tester intercepts API responses and analyzes them for leaked PII, internal identifiers, debug information, or sensitive business data that the UI does not…
implementing-api-schema-validation-security
Implement API schema validation using OpenAPI specifications and JSON Schema to enforce input/output contracts and prevent injection, data exposure, and mass assignment attacks.