Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nlook-service/issue-template --skill issue-loopgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nlook-service/issue-templateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nlook-service/issue-template/issue-loop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nlook-service/issue-template/issue-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nlook-service/issue-template/issue-loop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nlook-service/issue-template/issue-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nlook-service/issue-template/issue-loop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.07180 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.02872 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.01436 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00718 |
Grade A, and why
issue-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 247 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/issue-loop
/spec → /implement-issue → /review-pr을 매번 세션을 열어 돌리는 대신, 루프 드라이버가 GitHub 상태를 읽고 각 걸음을 새 서브에이전트에 위임해 자동 반복한다. 원본의 원칙 유지: ① 이슈 1개 = 세션 1개, ② 리뷰는 구현과 다른 세션 (둘 다 걸음별 독립 서브에이전트로 자동 충족), ③ 설계 분해안·UI 시안 승인과 risk:high 머지는 언제나 사람 — 일반 머지는 기본 모드에선 사람이 결정하고 루프가 실행, 무인 모드에선 강화 리뷰가 대신한다.
Usage
/issue-loop # 이어하기: GitHub 상태를 읽고 루프 시작/재개
/issue-loop "<기능 설명>" # 설계부터: spec(분해안·UI 시안 승인은 사람) → 이슈 등록 → 루프
/issue-loop <상위 이슈 번호> # 특정 기능([Feature] 이슈)으로 범위 제한
/issue-loop --label <태그> # 내가 붙인 태그가 있는 이슈만 (ai-task와 AND) — 범위 내 전부 완료가 목표
/issue-loop --once # 한 걸음만 진행하고 종료
/issue-loop --status # 상태판 + 다음 계획만 출력 (dispatch 없음)
/issue-loop --max N # 걸음 수 안전상한 (기본: max(20, 범위 내 이슈 수 × 4))
/issue-loop --unattended # 완전 무인: agent:auto 이슈만 · 질문 대신 건너뜀 · 강화 리뷰 통과 PR 자동 머지
/issue-loop --economy # 한도 절약: 구현을 전부 sonnet으로 (리뷰·설계는 opus 유지)
/issue-loop --usage-guard N # 사용량 추정치가 N% 넘으면 걸음 경계에서 우아하게 중단 (기본 90, ccusage 필요)
0. 사전 확인 (매 실행 첫 단계)
git rev-parse --show-toplevel이 현재 디렉토리와 같은지 — 아니면 대상 저장소 루트로 이동을 안내하고 중단gh auth status통과 여부.claude/commands/implement-issue.md·.claude/commands/review-pr.md존재 여부 — 없으면 issue-templateinstall.sh실행을 안내하고 중단 (서브에이전트가 이 파일들을 계약서로 읽는다)--label <태그>가 주어졌으면:gh label list에 그 태그가 존재하는지, 그 태그가 붙은 열린 ai-task 이슈가 1개 이상인지 확인 — 없으면 오타 가능성을 알리고 중단 (조용히 빈 루프를 돌지 않는다)- 판정 라벨 존재 보장:
review:approved·review:rejected·needs-respec는 루프의 상태 원본이다 —gh label list에 없으면 즉시 생성한다 (gh label create <이름> --color <색> 2>/dev/null || true). 없는 채로 돌면 판정 라벨이 안 붙어 같은 PR을 무한 재리뷰한다 - 브랜치 보호 확인 (1인 개발 감지):
gh api "repos/{owner}/{repo}/branches/<기본브랜치>/protection/required_pull_request_reviews" --jq .required_approving_review_count 2>/dev/null— 값이 1 이상이면, 자기 PR을 자기가 승인할 수 없으므로 1인 리포에선 라벨 승인만으로gh pr merge가 거부된다고 루프 시작 전에 경고한다 (보호 규칙 완화 / 머지는 사람이 GitHub에서 직접 — 중 택일 안내). 조회 실패(보호 없음 404·권한 부족)는 조용히 건너뛴다 - 저널 디렉토리 준비:
mkdir -p .claude/issue-loop하고,.gitignore에.claude/issue-loop/가 없으면 추가 (저널은 로컬 상태 — 커밋 금지). 반대로.design/과docs/design/은 커밋 대상이다 — 이슈가 참조하는 계약물이므로 gitignore에 넣지 않는다 - 저널 마지막에
⏸ INTERRUPTED블록이 있으면 그 내용을 사용자에게 요약해 보여주고 이어서 진행 (상태 원본은 GitHub이므로 저널은 참고 컨텍스트일 뿐 — 재개는 항상 GitHub 상태 재수집으로 시작한다)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 247 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A e2f803a338e2
issue-loop is a skill published in the GitHub repository nlook-service/issue-template (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 7,180 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
merge-review
Reviews pending fleet worktree merges before they're accepted. Reads the merge-check queue, detects file-level conflicts between branches, proposes a safe merge order, and surfaces reconciliation plans for overlapping changes.
backlog
Read, work, and maintain a Git repo's deferred-work items in docs/backlog/, one file per item. Use when the user says "backlog", "check backlog", "what's on my backlog", "work the backlog", "address the backlog", "add to backlog", "clean up backlog", or when a review or task produced items that are real but not being…
catchup
Summarize and review what changed while you were away. Use after a weekend, vacation, or flight to check missed PRs, git commits, Linear tickets, and meetings — one prioritized brief, not a firehose.
jira
Jira integration — view issues, generate branches, create tickets, transition status. Use when: user mentions Jira ticket key (XX-123), says /jira, wants to create branch from ticket, create a new ticket, or update Jira status. Not for: GitHub issues (use issue-analyze).
glab
Expert guidance for using the GitLab CLI (glab) to manage GitLab issues, merge requests, CI/CD pipelines, repositories, and other GitLab operations from the command line. Use this skill when the user needs to interact with GitLab resources or perform GitLab workflows.
apex-status
CTO-level project status from git and codebase state. Use when asked "where are we", "project status", "what's done", or at the start of a work session.