Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/nmrtn/nanopm/pm-retronpx skills add nmrtn/nanopm --skill pm-retrogit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nmrtn/nanopmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nmrtn/nanopm/pm-retro)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nmrtn/nanopm/pm-retro"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nmrtn/nanopm/pm-retro.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00045 | $0.02622 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.01311 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00524 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00262 |
Grade C, and why
pm-retro scanned grade C with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Downloads and executes remote codehighSupply chain
curl | sh runs whatever the server returns today, which is not necessarily what it returned when this was reviewed.
{ echo "ERROR: nanopm not installed. Run: curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nmrtn/nanopm/main/setup | bash"; exit 1; } Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
{ echo "ERROR: nanopm not installed. Run: curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nmrtn/nanopm/main/setup | bash"; exit 1; } How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 222 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Multi-host portability rules. When invoking
AskUserQuestion:
- The
headerfield MUST be a short noun phrase (≤ 12 characters). Mistral Vibe rejects longer headers withstring_too_long. Pick from:Start,Target,Scope,Audience,Methodology,Feature,Question.- The
optionslist MUST have at least 2 items. Vibe rejects empty/single-option calls. For free-text input, always provide ≥ 2 framing options (e.g.Yes, here's the input/Skip) — never callask_user_questionwithoptions: [].
Preamble (run first)
source ~/.nanopm/lib/nanopm.sh 2>/dev/null || \
source .nanopm/lib/nanopm.sh 2>/dev/null || \
{ echo "ERROR: nanopm not installed. Run: curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nmrtn/nanopm/main/setup | bash"; exit 1; }
nanopm_preamble
_RETRO_FILE="$(nanopm_wiki_doc_path "retro-$(date +%F)")"
Phase 0: Prior context
source ~/.nanopm/lib/nanopm.sh 2>/dev/null || source .nanopm/lib/nanopm.sh 2>/dev/null || true
nanopm_context_read pm-retro
If prior retro found: "Prior retro from {ts}. This run covers commits since then."
Phase 0.5: Surface objectives and carry-forward items
Pull the specific OKRs and open opportunities before the full query — so the retro compares commits against measurable key results, not just broad plan summaries:
source ~/.nanopm/lib/nanopm.sh 2>/dev/null || source .nanopm/lib/nanopm.sh 2>/dev/null || true
nanopm_wiki_search "objective key result okr goal" objective 5
source ~/.nanopm/lib/nanopm.sh 2>/dev/null || source .nanopm/lib/nanopm.sh 2>/dev/null || true
nanopm_wiki_search "roadmap carry-forward shipped" doc 3
For each result, Read the full page (path column). Hold the specific KRs — use them in Phase 4 to check whether commits moved any measurable needle, not just whether they loosely map to a roadmap label.
Phase 1: Context assembly (query the wiki) + git repo check
The retro compares the planned work (the roadmap) against the actual work (git history). Pull the planned side through the query primitive — one read-side call that synthesizes the roadmap's current items, instead of reading the page directly (the recipe pattern). You reason over the cited synthesis the query returns. Print the prompt and dispatch it with the Agent tool (one subagent); on a host with no Agent tool, follow its steps inline.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 222 lines · 45 tokens per session scan C 70353656710d
pm-retro is a skill published in the GitHub repository nmrtn/nanopm (48 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 2,622 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 2 findings (downloads and executes remote code, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…