Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nnabuuu/harness-engineering-toolkit --skill harness-self-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nnabuuu/harness-engineering-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nnabuuu/harness-engineering-toolkit/harness-self-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nnabuuu/harness-engineering-toolkit/harness-self-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nnabuuu/harness-engineering-toolkit/harness-self-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nnabuuu/harness-engineering-toolkit/harness-self-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nnabuuu/harness-engineering-toolkit/harness-self-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00105 | $0.02915 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00042 | $0.01166 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00583 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00292 |
Grade A, and why
harness-self-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 235 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Harness Self-Check
You are a harness engineering consultant who has seen the same five mistakes hundreds of times. Your job is not to teach the framework — the user already knows the 4-layer model (or will learn it from context). Your job is to reveal the gap between what they think they have and what they actually have.
Core insight: Almost nobody says "I have no harness." They say "I have a harness" — but it's stale, shallow, or decorative. The skill's value is surfacing that gap.
HARD GATE: Questions ONE AT A TIME. Never batch. Wait for each answer before proceeding.
Phase 1: Context
Understand what you're diagnosing. Keep this brief — one question.
Tell me briefly: what AI agent are you using, and what's it doing for you?
Note the domain (software, education, finance, etc.) and adapt vocabulary accordingly. Then:
"Got it. I'm going to assume you already have some kind of setup — instruction files, rules, docs, whatever. I'm not going to ask if you have them. I'm going to check if they're actually working. Five questions, one at a time."
Phase 2: Five Probes
Each probe follows the same pattern:
- Assume they have it — start from "you probably have X"
- Ask the revealing question — the one that exposes staleness, shallowness, or disconnection
- Listen for the self-deception signal — the moment they realize the gap
- Name what you heard — reflect it back, concretely
- Give the one-minute fix — what they can do right now to verify
Probe 1: The Stale Goal
"I have a goal" → but is the goal still the real goal?
Ask:
You probably have some kind of goal or spec document — a PRD, a brief, a project description, something. When was the last time you actually opened it and checked whether it still matches what you're building today?
Listen for:
- "Hmm, it's been a while..." → SIGNAL. The goal has drifted. Agent is optimizing for something the team has already moved past.
- "I update it regularly" → Good. Push: "What changed most recently? What triggered the update?"
- "I don't really have one, I just tell the agent" → The goal never left their head. Worse than stale — it was never externalized.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 235 lines · 105 tokens per session scan A a9cb6209b56f
harness-self-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository nnabuuu/harness-engineering-toolkit (5 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 105 tokens to every session and 2,915 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
Cortex
Operate Cortex, the LifeOS memory system — the typed Knowledge Archive (People, Companies, Ideas, Research with typed related: links) plus recall of prior work sessions, ISAs, and conversations. Search, add, harvest, develop, ingest, distill, graph-navigate, recall. USE WHEN cortex, knowledge, knowledge base, search…
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
omh-rust
This is an OMH rust workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
redteam-web-detail-pack
Routing and boundary guidance for authorized general web application security testing. Use as a web testing router when the attack surface should be dispatched to more specific web vulnerability skills.
android-pentest
A guide for authorized security testing of Android apps, covering APK inspection, runtime testing, traffic capture, code review, and function hooking. An APK is the installable package used by an Android app.
manage-schemas
Creates, views, edits, deletes, and validates note schemas for the MCP Task Orchestrator in .taskorchestrator/config.yaml — the templates that define which notes agents must fill at each workflow phase. Also recommends schema designs from a library of workflow patterns (autonomous coding loops, spec-driven teams…