Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add no-human-ai/no_human --skill file-a-taskgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/no-human-ai/no_humanWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/no-human-ai/no_human/file-a-task)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/no-human-ai/no_human/file-a-task"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/no-human-ai/no_human/file-a-task/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/no-human-ai/no_human/file-a-task"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/no-human-ai/no_human/file-a-task.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.01031 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00412 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00206 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
file-a-task scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 101 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
File a task into no_human
Use the two MCP tools this plugin exposes — task_add and task_status — to
hand off work that should become a reviewed pull request, instead of making
the change yourself in this conversation.
When to use
- The work is substantial enough to deserve its own branch, its own tests, and independent review — not a one-line edit you can just make inline.
- You want no_human to plan, code, test, have the result reviewed by a second model, and open a pull request, while you keep doing something else.
- Do not use this for small edits you can make directly in the current conversation — that is strictly slower and adds no value.
Prerequisite: the local server must already be running
Both tools call the existing no_human HTTP API at http://127.0.0.1:8420.
The bridge does not retry or fall back if that address is unreachable —
it refuses to start at all (SystemExit, no auto-retry). Before using either
tool, make sure the server is running:
nh start
(The desktop app starts this for you automatically.) If a tool call fails with a connection error, the fix is to start the server, not to retry the call.
Tool: task_add
Creates a new no_human task via POST /api/tasks.
Parameters (all required strings):
| Name | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
title |
string | Short task title. |
description |
string | Full task description — inline the concrete context here (exact file paths, exact acceptance criteria), rather than referencing this conversation, since no_human cannot see it. |
repo_path |
string | Absolute path to the target repo checkout the task should run against. |
You do not pass source — the bridge sets it to "mcp" on every call it
makes, server-side, before the request is sent.
Returns: compact JSON with the new task's id and the source the server
actually stored (first-class alongside "board"/"jira"), e.g.:
{"task_id":"task-abc123","source":"mcp"}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 101 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 729e278d9818
file-a-task is a skill published in the GitHub repository no-human-ai/no_human (331 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,031 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
contract
A way to turn agreed design decisions into a formal software design document. The document gives coding agents or other implementers goals, decisions, rules, dependencies, non-goals, and open questions.
note
A lightweight decision log that appends settled decisions and references to a repository file. It records why a decision was made without copying the full source document.
retro
A post-run review process for a batch of coding tasks merged into the main branch. It collects repeated failures and turns them into proposed checks, review standards, or task templates.
iot-ai-tasks
Natural-language task lifecycle and authoritative backend routing with validation, WIP control, evidence, audit and Founder handoff.
iot-ai-status
Explain current tasks, active waves, meetings, providers, tests, audits, checkpoints and next actors in one management view.
create-issue
Draft and submit a GitHub issue from a user idea or bug description, with bilingual body and correct labels.