Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/noahrasheta/director/onboardnpx skills add noahrasheta/director --skill onboardgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/noahrasheta/directorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/noahrasheta/director/onboard)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/noahrasheta/director/onboard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/noahrasheta/director/onboard.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00024 | $0.08792 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.04396 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.01758 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00879 |
Grade A, and why
director:onboard scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 840 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Director Onboard
First, check if .director/ exists. If it does not, run the init script silently:
bash "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/init-director.sh"
Say only: "Director is ready." Then continue with the steps below.
Determine Project State
Read .director/VISION.md and determine the project state.
The init script creates a VISION.md with placeholder text like:
> This file will be populated when you run /director:onboard- Headings like
## What are we building?with no content beneath them
The onboard template uses a different format with placeholder text like:
_What are you calling this project?__One or two sentences about what this project does, in plain language._
Detection rule: If VISION.md contains either type of placeholder text -- or if headings have no substantive content beneath them (just blank lines, italic prompts, or template markers) -- the project has NOT been onboarded yet. Proceed to Detect Project Type.
If VISION.md has real content (substantive text under headings -- actual project descriptions, feature lists, tech choices, not just placeholders):
The user has already onboarded. Check whether there are existing codebase files beyond .director/ by looking at the project root. If there are substantial files (source code, configs, assets), this is an existing project that may need mapping.
Say something like:
"You already have a vision document. Want to update it, or would you like me to look through your existing code to make sure everything is captured?"
Wait for the user's response before proceeding.
If they want to update their vision:
Go to the Greenfield Interview section with their existing vision as context. Follow interviewer rule 7: adapt to what's already known -- skip questions that are already answered in the existing vision and focus on gaps, changes, and new information. This is an update conversation, not a redo.
If they want to map their code:
Run the deep mapping pipeline (see the Mapper Spawning section below for the exact process) to produce a comprehensive codebase analysis. Once the mapping is complete and findings are presented, ask the user if anything in the findings changes what they want to build or suggests updates to their vision. If yes, walk them through updating the relevant parts of their vision document. If the vision looks accurate, confirm and move on.
What ships with it
15 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- templates/codebase/ARCHITECTURE.md 2.4 KB
- templates/codebase/CONCERNS.md 2.0 KB
- templates/codebase/CONVENTIONS.md 2.4 KB
- templates/codebase/INTEGRATIONS.md 1.9 KB
- templates/codebase/STACK.md 1.5 KB
- templates/codebase/STRUCTURE.md 2.3 KB
- templates/codebase/SUMMARY.md 2.6 KB
- templates/codebase/TESTING.md 2.6 KB
- templates/config-defaults.json 1.2 KB
- templates/research/ARCHITECTURE.md 3.0 KB
- templates/research/FEATURES.md 2.6 KB
- templates/research/PITFALLS.md 2.8 KB
- templates/research/STACK.md 2.7 KB
- templates/research/SUMMARY.md 4.2 KB
- templates/vision-template.md 761 B
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 840 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 36360a75247b
director:onboard is a skill published in the GitHub repository noahrasheta/director (1 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 8,792 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
gsd-complete-milestone
Archive completed milestone and prepare for next version.
gsd-discuss-phase
Gather phase context through adaptive questioning before planning.
gsd-debug
Systematic debugging with persistent state across context resets.
gsd-capture
Capture ideas, tasks, notes, and seeds to their destination.
gsd-code-review
Review source files changed during a phase for bugs, security issues, and code quality problems.
gsd-config
Configure GSD settings — workflow toggles, advanced knobs, integrations, and model profile.