Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nobodyohm-web/Thot --skill trl-fine-tuninggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nobodyohm-web/ThotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nobodyohm-web/thot/trl-fine-tuning)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nobodyohm-web/thot/trl-fine-tuning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nobodyohm-web/thot/trl-fine-tuning/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nobodyohm-web/thot/trl-fine-tuning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nobodyohm-web/thot/trl-fine-tuning.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.03635 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.01818 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00727 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00364 |
Grade A, and why
trl-fine-tuning scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to trl-fine-tuning — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 499 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
TRL - Transformer Reinforcement Learning
Quick start
TRL provides post-training methods for aligning language models with human preferences.
Installation:
pip install trl transformers datasets peft accelerate
Supervised Fine-Tuning (instruction tuning):
from trl import SFTTrainer
trainer = SFTTrainer(
model="Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B",
train_dataset=dataset, # Prompt-completion pairs
)
trainer.train()
DPO (align with preferences):
from trl import DPOTrainer, DPOConfig
config = DPOConfig(output_dir="model-dpo", beta=0.1)
trainer = DPOTrainer(
model=model,
args=config,
train_dataset=preference_dataset, # chosen/rejected pairs
processing_class=tokenizer
)
trainer.train()
Common workflows
Workflow 1: Full RLHF pipeline (SFT → Reward Model → RLOO)
Complete pipeline from base model to human-aligned model.
Note (TRL 1.x): PPO has been removed from TRL —
PPOTrainer,PPOConfig, andpython -m trl.scripts.ppono longer exist. Use an online-RL trainer TRL still ships: RLOO (RLOOTrainer/trl rloo) is the closest drop-in for a reward-model-driven RLHF pipeline, and GRPO (GRPOTrainer/trl grpo, see Workflow 3) is the memory-efficient alternative. The step below uses RLOO.
Copy this checklist:
RLHF Training:
- [ ] Step 1: Supervised fine-tuning (SFT)
- [ ] Step 2: Train reward model
- [ ] Step 3: RLOO reinforcement learning
- [ ] Step 4: Evaluate aligned model
Step 1: Supervised fine-tuning
Train base model on instruction-following data:
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
from trl import SFTTrainer, SFTConfig
from datasets import load_dataset
# Load model
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B")
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B")
# Load instruction dataset
dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/Capybara", split="train")
# Configure training
training_args = SFTConfig(
output_dir="Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT",
per_device_train_batch_size=4,
num_train_epochs=1,
learning_rate=2e-5,
logging_steps=10,
save_strategy="epoch"
)
# Train
trainer = SFTTrainer(
model=model,
args=training_args,
train_dataset=dataset,
processing_class=tokenizer
)
trainer.train()
trainer.save_model()
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 499 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 5d1837410fff
trl-fine-tuning is a skill published in the GitHub repository nobodyohm-web/Thot (0 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 3,635 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to trl-fine-tuning, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
weights-and-biases
W&B: log ML experiments, sweeps, model registry, dashboards.
nemo-curator
Curate LLM training data: dedupe, filter, PII redaction.
llava
Vision-language chat: VQA, captioning, image dialogue.
open-source
Documentation reference for writing Python code using the browser-use open-source library. Use this skill whenever the user needs help with Agent, Browser, or Tools configuration, is writing code that imports from browseruse, asks about @sandbox deployment, supported LLM models, Actor API, custom tools, lifecycle…
llama-factory
Expert guidance for fine-tuning LLMs with LLaMA-Factory - WebUI no-code, 100+ models, 2/3/4/5/6/8-bit QLoRA, multimodal support.
running-zeroshot-ner
Extract arbitrary, custom entity types from clinical or biomedical text with no fine-tuning using OpenMed's GLiNER / GLiNER2 zero-shot support. Use when the user wants to define their own labels on the fly (e.g. Drug, Symptom, Device, Procedure), has no labelled data or a label set not covered by a fine-tuned model…