Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to nodealchemy/powernode-platform. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nodealchemy/powernode-platform/develop/.claude/skills/audit/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nodealchemy/powernode-platformWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nodealchemy/powernode-platform/audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nodealchemy/powernode-platform/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nodealchemy/powernode-platform/audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nodealchemy/powernode-platform/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nodealchemy/powernode-platform/audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00931 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00372 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00186 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 93 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Codebase Quality Audit
Run quality checks and report results. Accept an optional focus argument to limit scope.
Focus Areas
- all (default) — run everything
- backend — Ruby checks only (steps 1, 4, 5, 6)
- frontend — Frontend checks only (steps 3, 7, 8)
- types — TypeScript type check only (step 3)
- patterns — Pattern validation only (steps 1, 2)
Checks
Run applicable checks sequentially. Capture output from each.
The harness does not export $PROJECT_DIR, and shell state does not carry between Bash calls, so
each command below defines it first as the repository root.
1. Pattern Validation
PROJECT_DIR="$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)"; cd $PROJECT_DIR && ./scripts/pattern-validation.sh
2. Quick Pattern Check
PROJECT_DIR="$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)"; cd $PROJECT_DIR && ./scripts/quick-pattern-check.sh
3. TypeScript Type Check
PROJECT_DIR="$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)"; cd $PROJECT_DIR/frontend && npx tsc --noEmit 2>&1
4. Ruby Syntax Check
Check all .rb files changed since last commit:
PROJECT_DIR="$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)"; cd $PROJECT_DIR/server && git diff --name-only --relative HEAD -- '*.rb' | xargs -I{} ruby -c {} 2>&1
Also check untracked .rb files:
PROJECT_DIR="$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)"; cd $PROJECT_DIR/server && git ls-files --others --exclude-standard -- '*.rb' | xargs -I{} ruby -c {} 2>&1
5. Rails Eager Load Check (backend only)
Verify all Ruby classes load without errors:
PROJECT_DIR="$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)"; cd $PROJECT_DIR/server && bundle exec rails runner "Rails.application.eager_load!; puts 'Eager load OK'" 2>&1
6. Frozen String Literal Pragma
Scan for Ruby files missing the pragma:
PROJECT_DIR="$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)"; grep -rL "frozen_string_literal: true" $PROJECT_DIR/server/app/ --include="*.rb" | head -20
7. Console.log Scan
PROJECT_DIR="$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)"; grep -rn "console\.log" $PROJECT_DIR/frontend/src/ --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx" | head -20
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +3 lines dd2bc044feff
- 2mo ago First seen · 90 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A cf79fa897367
audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository nodealchemy/powernode-platform (4 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 931 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Reviews code for bugs, security issues, and best practices.
resolve-review-pr
Review an existing fix PR using the audited repro and full diff, preserving branch and approval rules.
cocoreview
CocoReview — structured code review with six-severity findings vocabulary, progressive disclosure architecture, and universal anti-pattern baseline. Invoked via $review [file] [--complexity] [--security] [--architecture] [--language ].
dx-audit
Audits libraries, CLIs, and SDKs using 38 rules for public contracts, package exports, piped output, errors, and configuration. Use when asked to "audit my CLI", "review my SDK", or diagnose package type resolution.
code-review
Performs structured code review on a file or directory.
review-rfc
Review an implemented RFC in a fresh context against its acceptance criteria, RULES.md and the test plan, and save the review to reviews/.