NoizuPromptLingo: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/source-command-reflect/SKILL.md

source-command-reflect is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from noizu-labs-ml/NoizuPromptLingo. It costs 48 tokens per session (964 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A response self-review instruction that adds a reflection block after every answer. The block checks for errors, security problems, pitfalls, improvements, edge cases, and unfinished work.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for reviewing responses and labeling findings such as bugs, security issues, edge cases, documentation gaps, and verified points.
Why use it?
It encourages the agent to inspect its own answer for common mistakes or omissions before finishing.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

This is noizu-labs-ml/NoizuPromptLingo's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Codex how to work on NoizuPromptLingo itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything NoizuPromptLingo configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to noizu-labs-ml/NoizuPromptLingo. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/noizu-labs-ml/NoizuPromptLingo/main/.agents/skills/source-command-reflect/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/noizu-labs-ml/NoizuPromptLingo

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for source-command-reflect

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/noizu-labs-ml/noizupromptlingo/source-command-reflect/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/noizu-labs-ml/noizupromptlingo/source-command-reflect)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/noizu-labs-ml/noizupromptlingo/source-command-reflect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/noizu-labs-ml/noizupromptlingo/source-command-reflect/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for source-command-reflect

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/noizu-labs-ml/noizupromptlingo/source-command-reflect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/noizu-labs-ml/noizupromptlingo/source-command-reflect.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 48 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 964 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00048 $0.00964
Opus 5 $0.00024 $0.00482
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00193
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00096

Measured 4d ago against content hash 515c17e43422, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

source-command-reflect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/source-command-reflect/SKILL.md · 153 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 153 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

source-command-reflect

Use this skill when the user asks to run the migrated source command reflect.

Command Template

Reflection Guide

Purpose

Append a reflection block to the end of every response reviewing the response for potential issues, improvements, and oversights.

Output Format

At the end of every response, append:

<npl-block type="reflection">
[reflection content with emoji indicators]
</npl-block>

Emoji Indicators

Emoji Category Use For
🐛 Bug/Error Logical errors, incorrect code, wrong assumptions
🔒 Security Security vulnerabilities, unsafe practices, exposed secrets
⚠️ Pitfall Common mistakes, gotchas, things that often go wrong
🚀 Improvement Performance gains, better approaches, optimizations
🧩 Edge Case Unhandled scenarios, boundary conditions, null cases
📝 TODO Incomplete items, placeholders, things to revisit
🔄 Refactor Code smell, duplication, structural improvements
📚 Docs Missing documentation, unclear explanations
Verified Confirmed correct, tested, validated
Question Needs clarification, ambiguous requirements

Reflection Content

Review the response for:

  1. Correctness — Is the code/answer right?
  2. Security — Any vulnerabilities introduced?
  3. Edge cases — What wasn't handled?
  4. Improvements — What could be better?
  5. Completeness — What's missing?

Examples

Example 1: Code Response

After providing code for user authentication:

<npl-block type="reflection">
🔒 Password not hashed before storage — add bcrypt
🧩 No handling for duplicate email registration
⚠️ Token expiry set to 30 days — consider shorter for sensitive apps
🚀 Could add refresh token rotation
✅ Input validation present
</npl-block>

Example 2: Architecture Suggestion

After suggesting a caching strategy:

<npl-block type="reflection">
🧩 Cache invalidation on updates not addressed
⚠️ Redis connection failure fallback not specified
📝 TODO: Define TTL values per resource type
✅ Pattern appropriate for read-heavy workload
</npl-block>

Read the full file on GitHub · 153 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 153 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 515c17e43422

Subscribe to this mod's changes

source-command-reflect is a skill published in the GitHub repository noizu-labs-ml/NoizuPromptLingo (13 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 964 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

debug-optimize-lcp

Guides debugging and optimizing Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) using Chrome DevTools MCP tools. Use this skill whenever the user asks about LCP performance, slow page loads, Core Web Vitals optimization, or wants to understand why their page's main content takes too long to appear. Also use when the user mentions…

ChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp · 99 tokens

systematic-debugging

Use when debugging a failing test, build error, or runtime issue that isn't immediately obvious. Guides a 4-phase root cause analysis instead of random fix attempts.

open-metadata/OpenMetadata · 37 tokens

diagnose

Trace from a reproduced symptom to the source code that causes it. Pin the specific file and approximate line, rate confidence in the cause and clarity of the fix independently, and always propose a concrete fix.

emdash-cms/emdash · 43 tokens

repro-admin

Reproduce an EmDash admin UI bug. Attach a container, start the demo dev server, drive the admin with agent-browser using the dev-bypass session, and capture the reproduction as screenshots plus a replayable transcript.

emdash-cms/emdash · 48 tokens

log-error-digest

Analyze log files to troubleshoot errors, identify peak error periods, and produce error clustering, frequency statistics, and time distribution reports. Supports JSON, syslog, and Nginx formats with automatic detection. Use when a user uploads a .log file and asks to analyze errors, find patterns, debug issues, or…

zebbern/claude-code-guide · 71 tokens

byted-util-volcengine-detect-retry

An orchestration workflow for Volcengine Cloud Detect, a service that checks websites or network endpoints from test locations.

bytedance/agentkit-samples · 101 tokens