Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Nolpak14/getregdata --skill eu-financial-transparencygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Nolpak14/getregdataWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nolpak14/getregdata/eu-financial-transparency)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nolpak14/getregdata/eu-financial-transparency"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nolpak14/getregdata/eu-financial-transparency.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00206 | $0.02379 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00103 | $0.01189 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00476 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00238 |
Grade A, and why
eu-financial-transparency scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 185 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
eu-financial-transparency
Find out which EU grants and directly-managed EU funding an organisation has received - free, keyless, no login. The EU Financial Transparency System (FTS) is the European Commission's public list of recipients of funds the Commission manages directly (grants, procurement contracts) and indirectly, plus the European Development Fund. This is an EU-funding-recipient due-diligence + grant-recipient lead-gen lane: it answers which EU money has this organisation received, how much, under which programme, in which year, and for what action - it is not a company registry and does not confirm a company exists or trades.
FTS is published as bulk annual datasets, not a per-name query API. The skill is
the same pattern as eu-transparency-register: download the year file(s) once, cache
them, then filter and match locally by name, country, and programme.
Persona
You are a due-diligence analyst and lead-gen researcher working the public-money angle. You read FTS to answer two questions: has this counterparty received EU grants or direct EU funding, how much, and under which programme (a credibility and public-exposure signal), and which organisations are being funded in a programme or country (a warm grant-recipient list - recipients of EU money are an ICP that has already cleared a Commission funding process).
What this gives you (for free)
- Every recipient of directly / indirectly managed EU funds - beneficiaries of Commission-managed grants and procurement, plus the European Development Fund: companies, NGOs, universities, research bodies, public authorities, and consortia.
- The amounts - the committed amount and the EU contribution for each recipient, per action / year.
- The funding context - the programme name, the budget line, the subject / action or project, the funding type and contract type, and the responsible Commission department.
- Recipient identity - beneficiary name, VAT number, beneficiary type, country and city, and the coordinator / consortium role where the action is a multi-partner project.
- Project metadata - the reporting year and the project status.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 185 lines · 206 tokens per session scan A 336dc3cf1a57
eu-financial-transparency is a skill published in the GitHub repository Nolpak14/getregdata (6 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 206 tokens to every session and 2,379 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
apify-x402-agentic-wallet
Discover, pay for, and run any Apify Actor by paying USDC on Base over the x402 protocol with a Coinbase Agentic Wallet (awal) — no Apify account or API key. You buy one small, spend-capped prepaid Apify token, then run as many Actors as the request needs with it. Use when the user wants to use Apify tools without…
regtech-expert
Expert in regulatory technology, compliance automation, KYC/AML, transaction monitoring, risk assessment, and automated reporting. Use when the user mentions compliance, KYC, AML, transaction monitoring, risk assessment, or regulatory reporting, or when the task involves KYC/AML Compliance, KYC/AML Program, Regulatory…
risk-assessment
Deterministic heuristic risk scoring using a four-factor weighted model (Geographic 30%, Customer 35%, Product 25%, Channel 10%) aligned with Basel III, EBA Guidelines, FATF standards, and FinCEN guidance. Bands: LOW (0-20), MEDIUM (21-60), HIGH (61-80), CRITICAL (81-100).
Transaction Monitoring Alert Triage
Use when triaging a transaction-monitoring alert or small alert batch on an existing customer to inventory the alert and the rule that fired, compare the customer's expected-activity baseline against observed activity, structure the escalate / close / request-more-information analysis, and package a…
transaction-monitoring
AML transaction monitoring for ongoing customer relationships. Identifies suspicious patterns including structuring, layering, and unusual activity. Assesses against regulatory thresholds and prepares Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) with HITL decision gates.
sector-rotation
An analysis framework for comparing industries in the Chinese A-share stock market, using business conditions, price momentum, valuation, and money flows. It produces rankings and higher- or lower-allocation suggestions.