Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/nolpak14/getregdata/eu-transparency-registernpx skills add Nolpak14/getregdata --skill eu-transparency-registergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Nolpak14/getregdataWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nolpak14/getregdata/eu-transparency-register)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nolpak14/getregdata/eu-transparency-register"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nolpak14/getregdata/eu-transparency-register.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00176 | $0.02201 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00088 | $0.01100 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00035 | $0.00440 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00220 |
Grade A, and why
eu-transparency-register scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -sL -o transparency-register.xml \ How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 177 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
eu-transparency-register
Check whether a company, NGO, consultancy, or trade association lobbies the EU institutions - free, keyless, no login. The EU Transparency Register is the joint European Parliament + European Commission list of interest representatives. This is an influence / reputational / ESG due-diligence lane: it answers does this organisation lobby the EU, on which legislative files, how much does it spend, how many lobbyists does it field, and does it hold European Parliament access badges - it is not a company registry and does not confirm a company exists or trades.
The register is published as a bulk daily XML dump, not a per-name query API.
The skill is the same pattern as sanctions-pep-screening: download the full file
once, cache it, then filter and match locally by name, country, and category.
Persona
You are an integrity / ESG / reputational due-diligence analyst. You want to know whether a counterparty is an active EU lobbyist, what policy files it is trying to influence, the budget band it declares for that lobbying, and whether it fields staff with European Parliament access. You read the register as a signal of influence and disclosure discipline - not as proof of existence or good standing.
What this gives you (for free)
- Every registered interest representative - organisations that have declared they seek to influence EU policy: consultancies, in-house corporate lobbyists, NGOs, trade and business associations, think-tanks, law firms, and others.
- Lobbying subject matter - the organisation's stated goals and interests, the levels of interest (EU / national / regional), the EU legislative proposals it is engaged on, and its communication activities.
- Lobbying footprint - the number of persons involved in lobbying (headcount and FTE) and the number of European Parliament accreditation badges held.
- Self-declared cost / financial data - the annual lobbying budget bands and related financial blocks the organisation reported.
- Identity and category - identification code, name / original name / acronym, registration category, entity form, head-office country and address, website, and registration + last-update dates.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 177 lines · 176 tokens per session scan A c7110ab22dfb
eu-transparency-register is a skill published in the GitHub repository Nolpak14/getregdata (6 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 176 tokens to every session and 2,201 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
onboarding
Full KYC customer onboarding with mandatory Step 0 independent verification (5+1 searches), 17 sequential stagegates requiring explicit analyst consent, deterministic four-factor risk scoring, case folder auto-creation, 4-sheet Excel dashboard, 17-section PDF report, and immutable audit trail. Covers UK/EU (AMLD5), US…
risk-assessment
Deterministic heuristic risk scoring using a four-factor weighted model (Geographic 30%, Customer 35%, Product 25%, Channel 10%) aligned with Basel III, EBA Guidelines, FATF standards, and FinCEN guidance. Bands: LOW (0-20), MEDIUM (21-60), HIGH (61-80), CRITICAL (81-100).
screening
Comprehensive sanctions and PEP screening against 12+ databases (OFAC, EU, UK, UN, INTERPOL) with false positive assessment, HITL decision gates, and regulatory-compliant documentation.
refresh
Periodic customer refresh with re-verification of original due diligence to detect material changes and maintain compliance with ongoing due diligence requirements. Triggers include time-based review (annual HIGH risk, 2-3 year intervals for MEDIUM/LOW), risk-based escalation (score changes, business pivots), and…
AML Program Gap Review
Use when reviewing an AML/BSA or equivalent anti-money-laundering compliance program document set against the program elements the firm's own policy or a user-supplied regulatory framework defines, to inventory the program documents, map each required element to where the program addresses it, build a gap matrix, and…
KYC Onboarding Review
Use when reviewing a client or investor onboarding packet to inventory documents, extract KYC fields, apply the firm's KYC/AML rules grid, propose a customer risk rating, and assemble an escalation packet for compliance and attorney review.