Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Nolpak14/getregdata --skill latvia-company-registrygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Nolpak14/getregdataWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nolpak14/getregdata/latvia-company-registry)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nolpak14/getregdata/latvia-company-registry"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nolpak14/getregdata/latvia-company-registry/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nolpak14/getregdata/latvia-company-registry"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nolpak14/getregdata/latvia-company-registry.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00213 | $0.03081 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00106 | $0.01541 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00616 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00308 |
Grade A, and why
latvia-company-registry scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
**curl pattern** (no auth header on any endpoint): How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 161 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
latvia-company-registry
Free, official Latvian company data from the Register of Enterprises (Uznemumu registrs) published as open data on the national portal data.gov.lv. This skill needs no paid actor, no Apify token, and no API key at all - the datasets are open. Use it as the front door for Latvian entity verification, and route to the paid regdata actors when you need a jurisdiction that has no free API.
Persona
You are a KYB / due-diligence analyst verifying Latvian companies against the official register. You resolve a company to its regcode (registration number), confirm it is still registered (not terminated or closed), identify its board and officers, and - the standout for Latvia - pull its beneficial owners directly from the open UBO dataset, all from the authoritative source, the Register of Enterprises, not a commercial aggregator.
What this gives you (for free)
- Company profile - regcode, name (with name_in_quotes parsed out), regtype / regtype_text and type / type_text (legal form, e.g. Komercregistrs, Individualais komersants), registered date, terminated and closed dates, full address, region, city, and atvk territorial code.
- Officers / board (amatpersonas) - board members and representatives with position, governing_body, name, masked Latvian identity number, birth date, and rights_of_representation_type (sole vs joint signing).
- Beneficial owners / UBO (patiesie labuma guveji) - the real people who own or control the entity: forename, surname, masked Latvian identity number, birth date, nationality, and residence (ISO country codes). This is the highlight - see below.
Latvia publishes beneficial owners openly - AML gold
Most countries lock UBO data behind logins, fees, or "legitimate interest" gates. Latvia was among the first to publish beneficial ownership as open data (Beneficial Ownership Data Standard), CC0 public domain, row-queryable, no key. For an AML / KYB analyst that is rare and high-value: you get the controlling natural persons directly, at no cost, from the primary source. Treat the Latvian UBO dataset as a first-class check, not an afterthought.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 161 lines · 213 tokens per session scan A 7113356cd4d9
latvia-company-registry is a skill published in the GitHub repository Nolpak14/getregdata (6 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 213 tokens to every session and 3,081 once invoked, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
regtech-expert
Expert in regulatory technology, compliance automation, KYC/AML, transaction monitoring, risk assessment, and automated reporting. Use when the user mentions compliance, KYC, AML, transaction monitoring, risk assessment, or regulatory reporting, or when the task involves KYC/AML Compliance, KYC/AML Program, Regulatory…
onboarding
Full KYC customer onboarding with mandatory Step 0 independent verification (5+1 searches), 17 sequential stagegates requiring explicit analyst consent, deterministic four-factor risk scoring, case folder auto-creation, 4-sheet Excel dashboard, 17-section PDF report, and immutable audit trail. Covers UK/EU (AMLD5), US…
risk-assessment
Deterministic heuristic risk scoring using a four-factor weighted model (Geographic 30%, Customer 35%, Product 25%, Channel 10%) aligned with Basel III, EBA Guidelines, FATF standards, and FinCEN guidance. Bands: LOW (0-20), MEDIUM (21-60), HIGH (61-80), CRITICAL (81-100).
screening
Comprehensive sanctions and PEP screening against 12+ databases (OFAC, EU, UK, UN, INTERPOL) with false positive assessment, HITL decision gates, and regulatory-compliant documentation.
refresh
Periodic customer refresh with re-verification of original due diligence to detect material changes and maintain compliance with ongoing due diligence requirements. Triggers include time-based review (annual HIGH risk, 2-3 year intervals for MEDIUM/LOW), risk-based escalation (score changes, business pivots), and…
AML Program Gap Review
Use when reviewing an AML/BSA or equivalent anti-money-laundering compliance program document set against the program elements the firm's own policy or a user-supplied regulatory framework defines, to inventory the program documents, map each required element to where the program addresses it, build a gap matrix, and…