Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add norahe0304-art/30x-seo --skill 30x-seo-competitor-pagesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/norahe0304-art/30x-seoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/norahe0304-art/30x-seo/30x-seo-competitor-pages)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/norahe0304-art/30x-seo/30x-seo-competitor-pages"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/norahe0304-art/30x-seo/30x-seo-competitor-pages/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/norahe0304-art/30x-seo/30x-seo-competitor-pages"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/norahe0304-art/30x-seo/30x-seo-competitor-pages.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.01681 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00029 | $0.00672 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00336 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00168 |
Grade A, and why
30x-seo-competitor-pages scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to seo-competitor-pages — 37 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 210 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Competitor Comparison & Alternatives Pages
Create high-converting comparison and alternatives pages that target competitive intent keywords with accurate, structured content.
Page Types
1. "X vs Y" Comparison Pages
- Direct head-to-head comparison between two products/services
- Balanced feature-by-feature analysis
- Clear verdict or recommendation with justification
- Target keyword:
[Product A] vs [Product B]
2. "Alternatives to X" Pages
- List of alternatives to a specific product/service
- Each alternative with brief summary, pros/cons, best-for use case
- Target keyword:
[Product] alternatives,best alternatives to [Product]
3. "Best [Category] Tools" Roundup Pages
- Curated list of top tools/services in a category
- Ranking criteria clearly stated
- Target keyword:
best [category] tools [year],top [category] software
4. Comparison Table Pages
- Feature matrix with multiple products in columns
- Sortable/filterable if interactive
- Target keyword:
[category] comparison,[category] comparison chart
Comparison Table Generation
Feature Matrix Layout
| Feature | Your Product | Competitor A | Competitor B |
|------------------|:------------:|:------------:|:------------:|
| Feature 1 | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
| Feature 2 | ✅ | ⚠️ Partial | ✅ |
| Feature 3 | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Pricing (from) | $X/mo | $Y/mo | $Z/mo |
| Free Tier | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
Data Accuracy Requirements
- All feature claims must be verifiable from public sources
- Pricing must be current (include "as of [date]" note)
- Update frequency: review quarterly or when competitors ship major changes
- Link to source for each competitor data point where possible
Schema Markup Recommendations
Product Schema with AggregateRating
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "Product",
"name": "[Product Name]",
"description": "[Product Description]",
"brand": {
"@type": "Brand",
"name": "[Brand Name]"
},
"aggregateRating": {
"@type": "AggregateRating",
"ratingValue": "[Rating]",
"reviewCount": "[Count]",
"bestRating": "5",
"worstRating": "1"
}
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 210 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A f5aa69ea717d
30x-seo-competitor-pages is a skill published in the GitHub repository norahe0304-art/30x-seo (56 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 1,681 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to seo-competitor-pages, differing in 37 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
seo-audit
Single audit entry point — surface-level scorecard or deep infrastructure dive depending on the requested mode. Default full mode produces a multi-layer scorecard across all 9 areas (crawlability, indexation, meta tags, headings, images, Core Web Vitals, JS rendering, mobile + security, structured data, internal…
ai-visibility
Fast-path AI visibility analysis using public web signals, with a per-engine proxy map for ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, and Google AI Overviews. Runs in your Claude Code session without an Akii-hosted score or scoring API. Use when the user asks for "AI visibility", "AI visibility score", "free AI…
optimize-page
Comprehensive single-page optimization across all three layers — traditional SEO (title / meta / H1 / internal links), AEO (chunk quality, direct-answer leads, FAQ extraction), and GEO rewrites using the tactics published by the Princeton/IIT Delhi GEO study (citation integration, expert quotes, statistics enrichment…
broken-links
Find and fix broken links — three modes with different scale ceilings. local audits any local repo (HTML/MD/MDX, no size limit) via Glob/Grep + per-link verification. page checks one live URL deeply (30-100 outbound links per run). site requires the Ahrefs site-audit MCP for true multi-page crawl — without it, refuses…
competitor-intel
Fast-path competitor intelligence — produces a side-by-side SEO + AEO + GEO + AI visibility scorecard plus ranked counter-move plan. Three modes the skill ASKS the user to pick (no default): Quick (10s, surfaces 5 likely competitors from SERPs), Comprehensive (30-60s, multi-source discovery with Ahrefs MCP if…
content-strategy
Fast-path content strategy — produce a pillar + cluster topology, 90-day publishing queue, and quick-win refresh list in a single turn. This is the default for any content-planning question. Use when the user asks to "plan content", "content strategy", "content calendar", "what should I write about", "content gap…