Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Nordic-AI/production-readiness-skills --skill accessibility-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Nordic-AI/production-readiness-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nordic-ai/production-readiness-skills/accessibility-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nordic-ai/production-readiness-skills/accessibility-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nordic-ai/production-readiness-skills/accessibility-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nordic-ai/production-readiness-skills/accessibility-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nordic-ai/production-readiness-skills/accessibility-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00167 | $0.05782 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00084 | $0.02891 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00033 | $0.01156 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00578 |
Grade A, and why
accessibility-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 478 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Accessibility Audit
You review the application's accessibility — whether people with disabilities can use it. The standard is WCAG 2.2 Level AA; for products sold in the EU, the European Accessibility Act (EAA) makes this legally required from June 2025 for a broad category of products and services.
This skill follows the library-wide rules in docs/CONVENTIONS.md. Read that first.
Scope
Applies whenever the application has a user interface — web, mobile web, desktop Electron, native mobile if the codebase is visible. Does not apply to backend-only services or internal CLIs (but see release-readiness for operator tooling).
Inputs
From orchestrator: scope_tier, jurisdiction, stack_summary, gitnexus_indexed. Plus:
ui_framework: react | vue | angular | svelte | ember | plain-html | ios-native | android-native | flutter | othertarget_wcag_level: A | AA | AAA (default AA)eaa_in_scope: true | false — does the product fall under the EAA? (e-commerce, banking, transport tickets, e-books, computing hardware + OS, telecoms, AV media services, ATMs, etc.)
If not provided, ask.
Finding ID prefix
A11Y — see CONVENTIONS.md §4.
Tier thresholds
| Tier | WCAG A | WCAG AA | EAA applicable | Auto-testing | Manual screen-reader testing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| prototype | advisory | advisory | advisory | optional | optional |
| team | required | required for user-facing flows | required if applicable | required in CI | recommended |
| scalable | required | required everywhere | required if applicable + audited | required with zero-regression gate | required per major release |
Review surface
1. Semantic HTML
Semantic elements carry accessibility for free. Misused <div>/<span> is the most common accessibility failure.
<button>for clickable actions, not<div onClick>. The former is keyboard-focusable, has proper role, fires on Enter/Space.<a href>for navigation, not<button>or<div>withonClick={() => navigate(...)}.- Landmark elements:
<header>,<nav>,<main>,<aside>,<footer>— one<main>per page. - Heading hierarchy
<h1>–<h6>with no skips. - Form structure:
<label for>tied to<input id>,<fieldset>+<legend>for grouped inputs. - Lists:
<ul>/<ol>for lists, not series of<div>. - Tables:
<table>with<thead>,<tbody>,<th scope>for data tables. Never for layout. <dialog>for modal dialogs (or well-implemented ARIA dialog pattern), not just a styled<div>.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 478 lines · 167 tokens per session scan A 57d5d0a75978
accessibility-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository Nordic-AI/production-readiness-skills (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 167 tokens to every session and 5,782 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
fedramp
Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…
gdpr-compliance
Expert GDPR compliance assistant covering all four core workflows: (1) auditing code and systems for GDPR violations, (2) drafting GDPR-compliant documents such as privacy policies, Data Processing Agreements (DPAs), and consent notices, (3) answering GDPR compliance questions with authoritative article citations, and…
iso42001
Expert ISO 42001 AI Management System (AIMS) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO/IEC 42001:2023, AI governance, AI management systems, AI risk assessment, AI system impact assessment, Annex A controls for AI, Statement of Applicability for AI systems, AI policy, responsible AI, AI…
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route…
nist-800-53
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 compliance advisor — all 20 control families (AC, AT, AU, CA, CM, CP, IA, IR, MA, MP, PE, PL, PM, PS, PT, RA, SA, SC, SI, SR), Low/Moderate/High baseline selection, FIPS 199/200 system categorization, control tailoring and overlays, privacy controls (PT family), supply chain risk management (SR…
soc2
Expert SOC 2 compliance assistant covering all five Trust Services Criteria (Security/CC, Availability/A, Confidentiality/C, Processing Integrity/PI, Privacy/P). Use this skill whenever a user mentions SOC 2, Trust Services Criteria, SOC 2 Type 1 or Type 2, audit readiness, compliance gaps, control documentation…