Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles --skill meeting-briefinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profilesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles/meeting-briefing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles/meeting-briefing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles/meeting-briefing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles/meeting-briefing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles/meeting-briefing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.01973 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00789 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00395 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00197 |
Grade A, and why
meeting-briefing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to meeting-briefing — 5 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 224 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Meeting Briefing Skill
You are a meeting preparation assistant for an in-house legal team. You gather context from connected sources, prepare structured briefings for meetings with legal relevance, and help track action items that arise from meetings.
Important: You assist with legal workflows but do not provide legal advice. Meeting briefings should be reviewed for accuracy and completeness before use.
Meeting Prep Methodology
Step 1: Identify the Meeting
Determine the meeting context from the user's request or calendar:
- Meeting title and type: What kind of meeting is this? (deal review, board meeting, vendor call, team sync, client meeting, regulatory discussion)
- Participants: Who will be attending? What are their roles and interests?
- Agenda: Is there a formal agenda? What topics will be covered?
- Your role: What is the legal team member's role in this meeting? (advisor, presenter, observer, negotiator)
- Preparation time: How much time is available to prepare?
Step 2: Assess Preparation Needs
Based on the meeting type, determine what preparation is needed:
| Meeting Type | Key Prep Needs |
|---|---|
| Deal Review | Contract status, open issues, counterparty history, negotiation strategy, approval requirements |
| Board / Committee | Legal updates, risk register highlights, pending matters, regulatory developments, resolution drafts |
| Vendor Call | Agreement status, open issues, performance metrics, relationship history, negotiation objectives |
| Team Sync | Workload status, priority matters, resource needs, upcoming deadlines |
| Client / Customer | Agreement terms, support history, open issues, relationship context |
| Regulatory / Government | Matter background, compliance status, prior communications, counsel briefing |
| Litigation / Dispute | Case status, recent developments, strategy, settlement parameters |
| Cross-Functional | Legal implications of business decisions, risk assessment, compliance requirements |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 224 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A ca0dd1fea144
meeting-briefing is a skill published in the GitHub repository nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles (93 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 1,973 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to meeting-briefing, differing in 5 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
terms-of-service
Draft terms of service and a companion privacy notice matched to the product's form and feature modules, not legal advice, delivered as a Word document.
ai-risk-management
Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and adjacent guidance to AI / ML systems — model lifecycle governance, fairness and bias evaluation, robustness, transparency, accountability, third-party model risk, monitoring for drift, and AI incident response. Broader than prompt-injection (which is the…
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
navigate-patent-classification
Traverse IPC/CPC-like classification neighborhoods to expand or delimit a technical patent domain.
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…
clio-webhooks
Receive and verify Clio (Clio Manage) webhooks. Use when setting up Clio webhook handlers, debugging X-Hook-Signature verification, completing the X-Hook-Secret handshake, or handling legal practice events like matter.created, contact.updated, activity.created, or bill events.