performance-review

performance-review is a skill for Claude Code from nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles. It costs 61 tokens per session (1,141 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of performance-review, Apache-2.0.

A set of templates for writing employee performance reviews and preparing review discussions. It covers self-assessments, manager feedback, ratings, goals, growth areas, and promotion cases.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to create self-assessment forms, manager reviews, calibration documents, and promotion cases.
Why use it?
It gives reviews a consistent structure and helps turn general opinions into specific examples and evidence. This makes feedback easier to write and compare fairly.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: argument-hint in frontmatter.

Good fit Use it to create self-assessment forms, manager reviews, calibration documents, and promotion cases.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles/performance-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles --skill performance-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for performance-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles/performance-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles/performance-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles/performance-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles/performance-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for performance-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles/performance-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles/performance-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 61 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,141 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 89% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00061 $0.01141
Opus 5 $0.00030 $0.00571
Sonnet 5 $0.00012 $0.00228
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00114

Measured 7d ago against content hash c93ab887c66f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

performance-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

89% identical to performance-review — 10 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

profiles/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/anthropics_knowledge-work-plugins_human-resources/for-claude/.claude/skills/performance-review/SKILL.md · 154 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 154 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/performance-review

If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md (.forgecat/profiles/@forgecat/anthropics_knowledge-work-plugins_human-resources/CONNECTORS.md).

Generate performance review templates and help structure feedback.

Usage

/performance-review $ARGUMENTS

Modes

/performance-review self-assessment       # Generate self-assessment template
/performance-review manager [employee]    # Manager review template for a specific person
/performance-review calibration           # Calibration prep document

If no mode is specified, ask what type of review they need.

Output — Self-Assessment Template

## Self-Assessment: [Review Period]

### Key Accomplishments
[List your top 3-5 accomplishments this period. For each, describe the situation, your contribution, and the impact.]

1. **[Accomplishment]**
   - Situation: [Context]
   - Contribution: [What you did]
   - Impact: [Measurable result]

### Goals Review
| Goal | Status | Evidence |
|------|--------|----------|
| [Goal from last period] | Met / Exceeded / Missed | [How you know] |

### Growth Areas
[Where did you grow? New skills, expanded scope, leadership moments.]

### Challenges
[What was hard? What would you do differently?]

### Goals for Next Period
1. [Goal — specific and measurable]
2. [Goal]
3. [Goal]

### Feedback for Manager
[How can your manager better support you?]

Output — Manager Review

## Performance Review: [Employee Name]
**Period:** [Date range] | **Manager:** [Your name]

### Overall Rating: [Exceeds / Meets / Below Expectations]

### Performance Summary
[2-3 sentence overall assessment]

### Key Strengths
- [Strength with specific example]
- [Strength with specific example]

### Areas for Development
- [Area with specific, actionable guidance]
- [Area with specific, actionable guidance]

### Goal Achievement
| Goal | Rating | Comments |
|------|--------|----------|
| [Goal] | [Rating] | [Specific observations] |

### Impact and Contributions
[Describe their biggest contributions and impact on the team/org]

### Development Plan
| Skill | Current | Target | Actions |
|-------|---------|--------|---------|
| [Skill] | [Level] | [Level] | [How to get there] |

### Compensation Recommendation
[Promotion / Equity refresh / Adjustment / No change — with justification]

Read the full file on GitHub · 154 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago First seen · 154 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A c93ab887c66f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

performance-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles (66 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 1,141 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to performance-review, differing in 10 lines, and is treated as a copy.