Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add notforyou23/home23 --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/notforyou23/home23Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/notforyou23/home23/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/notforyou23/home23/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/notforyou23/home23/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/notforyou23/home23/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/notforyou23/home23/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00278 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00111 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00056 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
Code Review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code review
Review the requested change without silently implementing fixes. Report concrete behavioral defects in severity order, with file/line, the triggering condition, and the consequence. Do not invent findings or require tests that merely mirror implementation.
Home23 invariants to check where affected:
- Preserve local installation state, secrets, existing changes, and source ownership.
- Keep public defaults portable; do not put runtime state into Git.
- Honor instance/tool authority and fail-closed capability boundaries.
- Keep exact durable work IDs, cancellation semantics, and single-result delivery.
- Distinguish builds and job receipts from verified deployment or physical outcomes.
If no actionable findings remain, say so and identify material verification gaps.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -28 lines · -8 tokens per session e767a1fedd52
- 1mo ago First seen · 67 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 3c2e2d474b4d
Code Review is a skill published in the GitHub repository notforyou23/home23 (11 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 278 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr-reviewer
AI-powered pull request review and summarization - analyze diffs, detect bugs, security issues, suggest improvements, generate PR summaries, and auto-comment on GitHub PRs.
claude_code_delegation
Delegate coding, review, and refactor tasks to Claude Code CLI through Row-Bot's approval-gated shell workflow.
code-review
Automated code review with checklist and quality gates.
pr-review
Review a GitHub pull request and post one formal review — advance the existing discussion and give precision-first, high-signal feedback. Judgement on the diff, not a build gate — CI validates that it builds, and a targeted probe is allowed as evidence. Use when asked to review a PR or on a cron PR scan.
code-review
The shared rubric for reviewing a code change — precision-first, high-signal findings only (Critical/Important), what to check (correctness, contracts between producer and consumer, security, edge cases, regression risk, test coverage), and what is NOT a finding (pre-existing issues, linter territory, aspirational…
pr-comment
Answer a maintainer's question about an open PR with concrete, code-cited evidence. The PR-side counterpart to issue-comment — for questions tied to the diff, not a full review.