Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add NovaCode37/claude-security-skills --skill prompt-injection-testergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NovaCode37/claude-security-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/novacode37/claude-security-skills/prompt-injection-tester)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/novacode37/claude-security-skills/prompt-injection-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/novacode37/claude-security-skills/prompt-injection-tester/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/novacode37/claude-security-skills/prompt-injection-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/novacode37/claude-security-skills/prompt-injection-tester.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00084 | $0.00904 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00042 | $0.00452 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00181 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00090 |
Grade A, and why
prompt-injection-tester scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 105 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Prompt Injection Tester
A defensive red-team harness for evaluating the prompt-injection resistance of LLM applications you own or are authorized to test. It ships a library of well-documented public attack techniques and a canary-based detection engine that decides whether each attack succeeded — then scores overall resilience.
⚠️ Use only against systems you own or have permission to test. The payloads are public hardening techniques, intended to strengthen guardrails.
When to use this skill
- "Is my chatbot vulnerable to prompt injection / jailbreaks?"
- "Red-team / pentest my LLM app's system prompt."
- "Score how well my guardrails resist instruction-override attacks."
- Regression-testing guardrails in CI after a prompt change.
Attack categories covered
instruction-override · system-prompt-leak · role-play (DAN-style) ·
delimiter-escape · encoding (base64/leetspeak) · data-exfiltration
(indirect injection) · refusal-suppression.
How it works
- A unique canary secret is embedded into a guarded system prompt.
- Each payload is sent as the user turn.
- The response is scored: it's vulnerable if it hits an attack success-marker or leaks the canary; resisted if it refuses.
- You get a resilience score (0–100) and a per-category breakdown.
How to run it
List the payload library (no model calls):
python skills/prompt-injection-tester/attacker.py --list
python skills/prompt-injection-tester/attacker.py --list --category role-play
See the harness detect a weak vs. a hardened model:
python skills/prompt-injection-tester/attacker.py --demo # weak model
python skills/prompt-injection-tester/attacker.py --demo --hardened # safe model
python skills/prompt-injection-tester/attacker.py --demo --json
Exit codes: 0 clean (no payload succeeded, or --list) · 1 at least one
payload succeeded · 2 usage error.
Testing a real model (recommended workflow for Claude)
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed · +3 lines 9cee101b91ad
- 12d ago First seen · 102 lines · 84 tokens per session scan A d91d947b583a
prompt-injection-tester is a skill published in the GitHub repository NovaCode37/claude-security-skills (11 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 84 tokens to every session and 904 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
qa-testing
Run QA testing on a page, feature, or full site at one of three depth tiers (smoke, standard, full). Use this skill whenever the user asks to QA a page or site, run a smoke test after a deploy, verify a page before launch, or run a regression sweep. Triggers on QA, QA sweep, smoke test, regression test, post-deploy…
visual-qa
Runs rigorous visual QA across web, terminal, and paginated surfaces with screenshot evidence and a verdict. Use for any UI build or change, or when asked whether a page, component, or TUI looks right.
remove-ai-slops
Removes AI-generated code smells from branch changes or an explicit file list behind regression tests. Use when the user asks to clean up, deslop, or remove AI-slop patterns from recent changes.
agent-browser
Automates browser interactions for web testing, form filling, screenshots, and data extraction. Use when the user needs to navigate websites, interact with web pages, fill forms, take screenshots, test web applications, or extract information from web pages.
senpi-qa
QA the omo Senpi adapter (packages/omo-senpi, packages/senpi-task) against the REAL senpi binary in strict isolation, and write every artifact to the one canonical evidence path .omo/evidence/omo-senpi-adapter/ /. The live drivers under packages/omo-senpi/scripts/qa/ create their own isolated SENPICODINGAGENTDIR and…
suede-ai-eval
Suede Labs AI eval design and coverage audit: AI-SPEC, failure-mode rubric with severity scoring, concrete pass/fail eval cases, coverage and infrastructure scores, and mechanical acceptance gates. Use when a change ships LLM, RAG, agent, classifier, prompt, or generated-media behavior, or when asked to write evals…