Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/nowork-studio/notfair-plugin/copynpx skills add nowork-studio/notfair-plugin --skill copygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nowork-studio/notfair-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nowork-studio/notfair-plugin/copy)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nowork-studio/notfair-plugin/copy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nowork-studio/notfair-plugin/copy.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00121 | $0.01793 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00060 | $0.00897 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00359 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00179 |
Grade A, and why
google-ads-copy scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 95 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Ad Copy Generator + A/B Tester
Write Google Ads RSA copy and run structured tests to find winning messaging.
Setup
Read and follow ../shared/preamble.md (MCP detection, account selection) and ../shared/analysis-principles.md (evidence requirement, guardrails). Both apply throughout.
Reference
Read on demand:
references/rsa-best-practices.md— character limits, headline formulas, pinning, A/B mechanics, common mistakes. The source of truth for what to write.references/rsa-testing-lab.md— how to choose RSA test metrics, diagnose ad-group intent bloat, decide pinning, and avoid chasing Ad Strength over business outcomes.../manage/references/industry-benchmarks.md— industry CTR/CVR benchmarks for sanity-checking targets.../manage/references/quality-score-framework.md— only when QS improvement is the explicit goal.
Business context — non-negotiable input
Every copy decision is grounded in business context. Read {data_dir}/business-context.json and {data_dir}/personas/{accountId}.json first.
- If either file is missing or empty, recommend
/google-ads-auditbefore writing — generic copy that ignores positioning is wasted ad inventory. The full intake procedure (website crawl, schema, bootstrapping) lives in../audit/references/business-context.md. - If the user volunteers new info (new service, changed positioning, seasonal update), merge it in.
How context shapes copy: services map to headline categories; locations earn local-specific headlines (with QS upside); brand voice sets tone and forbidden words; differentiators ARE the value-prop headlines; competitors sharpen positioning (without naming them); seasonality decides urgency vs. evergreen framing; offers feed time-sensitive variants; landing-page content must match (or conversions drop). Personas drive language: their own search-term phrasing in headlines, their pain points in descriptions, their decision-trigger as the CTA angle.
Ad-strength vs. real performance
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 95 lines · 121 tokens per session scan A 4c113e91fb08
google-ads-copy is a skill published in the GitHub repository nowork-studio/notfair-plugin (3,447 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 121 tokens to every session and 1,793 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
domscribe
Work with Domscribe — the pixel-to-code bridge. Use when setting up, initializing, or configuring Domscribe for a project, OR when editing or modifying UI components (React, Vue, Next.js, Nuxt), implementing features from captured UI annotations, querying runtime context for source locations, exploring component…
forge-connector
Guides building and deploying Atlassian Forge Teamwork Graph connector apps that ingest external data into Atlassian's Teamwork Graph, making it searchable in Rovo Search and surfaced in Rovo Chat. Use when the user wants to build a Forge connector, ingest external data into Atlassian, connect a third-party tool (e.g.…
forge-cost-optimizer
Optimizes Atlassian Forge apps to reduce platform consumption and avoid unnecessary costs using Atlassian's "Optimise Forge platform costs" guidance. Use when the user asks to optimize Forge app costs, reduce Forge invocations, lower GB-seconds, reduce storage or log usage, tune memory, replace polling, improve…
forge-app-review
Performs a lightweight pre-release readiness review of Atlassian Forge apps across manifest/module wiring, architecture, runtime compatibility, dependency posture, tests, deploy readiness, and obvious security, cost, or reliability smells. Use when the user asks "review my Forge app", "pre-deploy check", "is this app…
logic-review
Find logic bugs in a single file or function via semi-formal execution tracing (Premises → Trace → Divergence → Trigger → Remedy). Trigger when a user shares code and suspects something is wrong without naming a concrete failure — phrases like "review this", "does this look right", "check this function", "audit this…
run-iteration-eval
Run the Logic-Lens content-eval pipeline for one iteration and produce a scored summary.json — use to measure a skill change. Wraps scripts/run-content-evals.sh (runner, costs tokens) and scripts/grade-iteration.py (grader, free, re-runnable). ALWAYS sync the plugin cache first. Use when the user wants to "run the…