Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nthnclrk/enablement-skills --skill certification-program-buildergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nthnclrk/enablement-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nthnclrk/enablement-skills/certification-program-builder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nthnclrk/enablement-skills/certification-program-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nthnclrk/enablement-skills/certification-program-builder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nthnclrk/enablement-skills/certification-program-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nthnclrk/enablement-skills/certification-program-builder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.01043 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00031 | $0.00417 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00209 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00104 |
Grade A, and why
certification-program-builder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 24d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 82 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Certification program builder
Define the work a person must demonstrate before they can perform a role or task independently.
Certification states what a person may do after they pass, and what evidence proves it. The ramp that prepares them is onboarding-program-builder. A practice drill may supply a scenario; it does not set the decision.
Observable gate. "Certified AE may run first-call discovery unsupervised. Pass: independently gets problem, cost, and a mutual next step. Hard fail: invents a customer result."
Quiz. "80% on the product quiz plus manager sign-off."
If two assessors cannot score the same evidence the same way, you do not have a standard yet.
Inputs
Reuse supplied context first. If a missing company fact would change the result, check the relevant sections of .enablement/context.md when available. Preserve source dates and approval limits.
Ask only for the inputs that change the standard:
- Role, critical tasks, and the failures this gate must catch
- What the result will control, and who owns the job standard
- Authentic evidence already available, plus examples of ready and not-ready work
- Assessor group, cohort size, and evaluation capacity
- Accommodation, retake, and recertification constraints
Do not invent a pass mark from convenience. Course completion, tenure, confidence, and manager familiarity are not readiness evidence.
Supporting material
Read references/certification-scoring-rules.md for anchors, hard fails, and calibration. Skip it if the user already has a governed rubric and only wants retake or recertification rules.
Procedure
- Write the readiness claim. What they may do, in which situations, with what independence. Done when a manager can use that sentence to grant or withhold work.
- Derive the smallest set of dimensions that covers the job and its material failure risks. Each dimension must distinguish competent from unsafe or ineffective work. Use knowledge checks for prerequisites where appropriate; they cannot replace demonstration of the task.
- Define authentic evidence for each dimension. Type, minimum quantity, allowed support, critical errors. Done when a quiz cannot substitute for the work.
- Write behavior anchors and practical prompts.
Dimension-specific
1through4. Generic labels are not a rubric. - Set the standard at minimally competent independent performance.
Overall threshold, critical-dimension minimums, non-compensable hard fails. Mark it
provisionaluntil the owner and a pilot support it. - Pilot on ready, borderline, and not-ready work samples. Investigate unexpected results against the task, anchors, accessibility, and independent evidence of competence. Revise the assessment or the prior classification as the evidence warrants; do not move the threshold simply to obtain a preferred pass rate.
- Calibrate assessors. Independent benchmark scoring, variance review, rescore gate. Do not go live while hard-fail calls still disagree.
- Test delivery capacity.
Demand, assessor time, moderation, accommodations, retakes. Return
fits,reduce,sequence, orblocked. - Write decision, appeal, retake, accommodation, recertification, and version rules.
- Ship the pack with owner, version, validation status, and the delivery decision.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 24d ago Changed · +2 lines f5a8f2bbaab7
- 2mo ago First seen · 80 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A 4617c64c1d94
certification-program-builder is a skill published in the GitHub repository nthnclrk/enablement-skills (16 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 1,043 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
certification-program-builder compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| certification-program-buildernthnclrk/enablement-skills | Skill | 16 | 25d ago | MIT | A | 77 | Codex |
| hr-onboardingnexu-io/open-design | Skill | 106k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 62 | Claude Code, Codex |
| book-mirrorgarrytan/gbrain | Skill | 32k | yesterday | MIT | A | 138 | Claude Code |
| exam-forecastanthropics/claude-for-legal | Skill | 9.9k | 3d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 73 | Claude Code |
| lean-formalizewanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep | Skill | 19k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 81 | Claude Code |
| eli5companion-inc/feynman | Skill | 10k | 6d ago | MIT | A | 63 | Claude Code, Codex |
| deck-course-modulenexu-io/html-anything | Skill | 9.4k | 25d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 25 | Claude Code, Codex |