Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nthnclrk/enablement-skills --skill manager-coaching-cadencegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nthnclrk/enablement-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nthnclrk/enablement-skills/manager-coaching-cadence)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nthnclrk/enablement-skills/manager-coaching-cadence"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nthnclrk/enablement-skills/manager-coaching-cadence/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nthnclrk/enablement-skills/manager-coaching-cadence"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nthnclrk/enablement-skills/manager-coaching-cadence.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.00935 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00467 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00187 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
manager-coaching-cadence scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 77 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Manager coaching cadence
Inspect one behavior every week. If the session could be a pipeline meeting, rewrite it.
A cadence is a repeatable loop: evidence, one inspect, one commitment, a later check. One recorded call is call-review-coach. One stalled deal is deal-inspection-coach.
Inspect. "This week we inspect next-step quality. Each 1:1: one clip, one keep, one change, one commitment due Friday. Success: the next call names an owner and a date."
Status. "Managers will coach more consistently and hold reps accountable to a culture of excellence."
If a manager cannot name the behavior they will listen for this week, there is no cadence yet.
Confirm Inputs First
Ask only for the inputs that change the rhythm:
- Team type, role mix, and how many reps
- The 1-3 behaviors worth inspecting, if known
- Protected coaching time and existing meetings
- Evidence they can actually review: calls, deals, CRM, notes
- Who may see coaching notes, and where formal performance management begins
If target behaviors or usable evidence are unknown, return an observation-baseline plan first. Do not present a full cadence as ready.
Read The Right Reference
Read references/manager-coaching-cadence-template.md for the capacity math, inspect-one-behavior test, and when a number is an invented threshold. Skip it if the user already has a working rhythm and only wants this week's inspect.
Default Workflow
- Pick the behaviors. One to three, each with a signal a manager can hear or see. Done when this week's inspect fits in one sentence.
- Calculate capacity before coverage. Protected minutes minus shared review, divided by a complete session. If it does not cover the team, prioritize by evidence, use group time for a shared gap, and rotate the rest. Never hide the shortfall by skipping review.
- Choose a rhythm that fits the team type and the envelope. New weekdays and deadlines are proposals until the manager confirms them. Do not invent numeric promotion or escalation cutoffs.
- Build the loop with time budgets. Evidence review, session, follow-up. Each session: one inspect, one keep, one change, one commitment.
- Capture only role-relevant evidence. Observation and commitment fields a manager will actually fill. Automated scores are leads, not findings. The rep can add context or correct the record.
- Set a trend review at a frequency the evidence volume can support. Separate skill, process, and pipeline or territory. Done when the review cannot be mistaken for a forecast meeting.
- Define escalation as a condition, not a number. Persistence, breadth, consequence, evidence sufficiency. Formal performance stays in the People process.
- Write a start plan for the first cycle.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 77 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A 1e606eeb9c90
manager-coaching-cadence is a skill published in the GitHub repository nthnclrk/enablement-skills (13 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 935 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
orbit-notion
Open Orbit briefing skill — selected by the Orbit pipeline when Notion is the user's only connected connector, or when the user explicitly scopes their daily digest to Notion. Pulls the past 24 hours of document edits, comments, mentions, and database row changes from the user's authenticated Notion connection and…
Cortex
Operate Cortex, the LifeOS memory system — the typed Knowledge Archive (People, Companies, Ideas, Research with typed related: links) plus recall of prior work sessions, ISAs, and conversations. Search, add, harvest, develop, ingest, distill, graph-navigate, recall. USE WHEN cortex, knowledge, knowledge base, search…
pinchtab-mcp
Use this skill when a task requires browser automation through PinchTab's MCP server connected to a remote browser instance. Covers navigation, element interaction, data extraction, form filling, multi-step flows, and session management via MCP tools.
feishu
Work with Feishu or Lark bots, docs, sheets, bitables, approval flows, and OpenAPI/MCP setup without hardcoding credentials.
peekaboo
Capture and automate macOS UI with the Peekaboo CLI.
mochi-remind
Handle due reminders — notify the user with natural language and mark them done.