Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nthnclrk/enablement-skills --skill pipeline-stage-definition-and-exit-criteriagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nthnclrk/enablement-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nthnclrk/enablement-skills/pipeline-stage-definition-and-exit-criteria)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nthnclrk/enablement-skills/pipeline-stage-definition-and-exit-criteria"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nthnclrk/enablement-skills/pipeline-stage-definition-and-exit-criteria/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nthnclrk/enablement-skills/pipeline-stage-definition-and-exit-criteria"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nthnclrk/enablement-skills/pipeline-stage-definition-and-exit-criteria.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.00975 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00029 | $0.00390 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00195 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00097 |
Grade A, and why
pipeline-stage-definition-and-exit-criteria scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 24d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 77 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Pipeline stage definition and exit criteria
Define stages that reflect the buyer's progress and give managers consistent evidence for moving a deal forward.
A good stage says what the buyer decided and what proof a manager can inspect. If the user wants one live deal reviewed, use deal-inspection-coach. If they want a period forecast, use forecast-risk-brief.
Buyer-signal exit. "Discovery exits when the buyer names the problem, its cost, and why it is funded this cycle. Required proof: a buyer-authored problem statement or recorded confirmation from the economic buyer."
Activity checklist. "Discovery exits when the AE logs a discovery call and fills the MEDDPICC fields."
The assignment rule should yield one current stage, while allowing earlier evidence to remain true and legitimate regressions to be recorded.
Inputs
Reuse supplied context first. If a missing company fact would change the result, check the relevant sections of .enablement/context.md when available. Preserve source dates and approval limits.
Ask only for the inputs that change the model:
- Current stage map and who operates it
- Historical stage evidence for a representative period, if it exists
- Target motions and the qualification method in use
- The inspection and forecast problems this redesign must fix
If history is missing, label the model a hypothesis. Do not invent conversion rates, aging norms, or CRM behavior.
Supporting material
Read references/stage-exit-framework.md before writing stage cards or governance. Read references/source-system-guide.md when the output must later map into CRM fields and reporting.
Procedure
- Establish the baseline. Find stages that are vague, skipped, slow, frequently regressed, or weakly tied to outcomes. Record data gaps. Done when you can name the broken stages and what evidence you lack.
- Give each stage one buyer signal. One purpose. One reason to move. Done when you can say the buyer state in a sentence a manager would use in a deal review.
- Set entry, exit, and proof. Required proof blocks progression except through a documented exception. Recommended proof coaches; it does not block. Keep required proof to the minimum buyer-validated evidence that reduces that stage's named risk.
- Name the anti-patterns. Sent proposal, booked meeting, populated field, and seller assertion are activity until buyer evidence shows what changed. Write how managers handle exceptions.
- Map to the qualification method. Attach only the MEDDPICC, SPICED, or local checks that belong to this stage's risk. Do not reprint the whole framework on every card.
- Backtest before rollout. Apply the criteria to won, lost, no-decision, and open deals. Report how many would progress, remain, regress, or need an exception. If history cannot support that, define a pilot.
- Set inspection and rollback. Define the manager and RevOps review rhythm, pilot measures, rollback owner, and restoration path. Use historical or owner-approved thresholds; otherwise name who must set them. Separate changes in recorded stage from changes in actual buyer progress.
- Map to systems last. Design the operating logic first. Then recommend fields, notes, and dashboards. Do not move live opportunities or flip required fields without explicit approval.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 24d ago Changed · +2 lines 922854dea2b1
- 2mo ago First seen · 75 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A 98757802b11d
pipeline-stage-definition-and-exit-criteria is a skill published in the GitHub repository nthnclrk/enablement-skills (16 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 975 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
pipeline-stage-definition-and-exit-criteria compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pipeline-stage-definition-and-exit-criterianthnclrk/enablement-skills | Skill | 16 | 25d ago | MIT | A | 73 | Codex |
| imagegenopenai/codex | Skill | 133k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Codex |
| playwright-climicrosoft/playwright | Skill | 99k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Skill | 79k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 200 | Claude Code, Codex |
| systematic-debuggingobra/superpowers | Skill | 313k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 95 | Claude Code |
| next-partial-prefetching-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 103 | Claude Code |