proposal-rfp-orchestrator

proposal-rfp-orchestrator is a skill for Codex from nthnclrk/enablement-skills. It costs 73 tokens per session (948 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A work coordinator for proposal and RFP responses. An RFP, or request for proposal, is a buyer's document listing what suppliers must answer and submit.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to decide bid or no-bid, build a compliance matrix, assign each requirement to an owner, organize contributors and approvals, and plan review cycles.
Why use it?
It prevents teams from starting to write before checking whether they can meet mandatory requirements. It also makes ownership, deadlines, evidence, approvals, and review gates explicit.

Skill for Codex

Written for Codex: agents/openai.yaml present.

Good fit Use it to decide bid or no-bid, build a compliance matrix, assign each requirement to an owner, organize contributors and approvals, and plan review cycles.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/nthnclrk/enablement-skills/proposal-rfp-orchestrator
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add nthnclrk/enablement-skills --skill proposal-rfp-orchestrator
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nthnclrk/enablement-skills

Made for: Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for proposal-rfp-orchestrator

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nthnclrk/enablement-skills/proposal-rfp-orchestrator/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nthnclrk/enablement-skills/proposal-rfp-orchestrator)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nthnclrk/enablement-skills/proposal-rfp-orchestrator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nthnclrk/enablement-skills/proposal-rfp-orchestrator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for proposal-rfp-orchestrator

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nthnclrk/enablement-skills/proposal-rfp-orchestrator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nthnclrk/enablement-skills/proposal-rfp-orchestrator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 73 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 948 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00073 $0.00948
Opus 5.5 $0.00029 $0.00379
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00015 $0.00190
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00095

Measured 24d ago against content hash ab55a2103341, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

proposal-rfp-orchestrator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 24d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/proposal-rfp-orchestrator/SKILL.md · 74 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Proposal RFP orchestrator

Help a proposal lead decide whether to bid, assign the response work, and verify every requirement before submission.

A good response process names the disqualifier, the owner of every atomic requirement, and the gate that stops an unverified yes. If the user wants a meeting brief, use executive-briefing-builder or account-brief-builder.

Bid/no-bid first. "The buyer requires SOC 2 Type II; our evidence covers Type I. The bid owner must obtain an explicit buyer-approved exception under the solicitation rules or decline. Internal approval cannot waive the buyer's requirement."

Writing sprint. "We'll figure out security in the challenge review. Start the executive summary."

If a mandatory answer is still a guess, the package is not ready.

Inputs

Reuse supplied context first. If a missing company fact would change the result, check the relevant sections of .enablement/context.md when available. Preserve source dates and approval limits.

Ask only for the inputs that change the workplan:

  1. Request type, solicitation ID, authoritative version, addenda, and precedence rules
  2. Question and submission deadlines with timezones
  3. Buyer requirements, evaluation criteria, and mandatory attachments
  4. Contributors, approved content sources, and required legal, security, finance, or executive approvals

If a planning input is missing, label the workplan assumption. Never use an assumption to answer a mandatory requirement or to make a factual, legal, security, commercial, or product claim.

Supporting material

Read references/proposal-governance-framework.md before building the compliance matrix, review gates, or readiness verdict.

Procedure

  1. Control the solicitation, then decide bid/no-bid. Confirm the authoritative version and addenda. Test mandatory disqualifiers, buyer access, solution fit, delivery capacity, economics, evidence readiness, and effort. Done when a named owner has bid, no-bid, or a dated exception path. Do not start section drafts before that.
  2. Build the requirement matrix. Split compound clauses into atomic children. Keep parent ID, version, addendum, locator, response location, owner, proof, and verification. Cross-reference shared answers. Done when every buyer shall/must has its own row.
  3. Assign owners and sources. Writer, SME, approver, and approved source of truth for each section. Restricted assets stay restricted.
  4. Shape the response strategy. Buyer problems, win themes, proof you actually have, and gaps that need escalation. Buyer language, not internal jargon.
  5. Apply hard stops. Unverified mandatory answers stay blocked with owner, evidence required, and due time. Never convert a placeholder into buyer-facing text.
  6. Run the gates. Use the review stages the team can staff: draft, challenge, and final where appropriate. Reconcile addenda and test compliance at each relevant stage. An internal exception does not waive a mandatory buyer requirement; record the buyer's authorised acceptance.
  7. Package for submission. Compliance, formatting, approvals, delivery instructions. Mark READY, READY WITH APPROVED EXCEPTION, or NOT READY. Do not send or upload without explicit user approval.

Read the full file on GitHub · 74 lines

Files

What ships with it

2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 24d ago Changed · +2 lines ab55a2103341
  2. 2mo ago First seen · 72 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A 23e30ea3661b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

proposal-rfp-orchestrator is a skill published in the GitHub repository nthnclrk/enablement-skills (16 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 948 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

proposal-rfp-orchestrator compared with skills from other repositories

proposal-rfp-orchestrator next to 6 skills from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
proposal-rfp-orchestratornthnclrk/enablement-skillsSkill1625d agoMITA73Codex
imagegenopenai/codexSkill133kyesterdayApache-2.0A113Codex
playwright-climicrosoft/playwrightSkill99kyesterdayApache-2.0A19Claude Code
local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginnersSkill79k4d agoMITA200Claude Code, Codex
systematic-debuggingobra/superpowersSkill313k3d agoMITA21Claude Code
next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.jsSkill143kyesterdayMITA95Claude Code
next-partial-prefetching-adoptionvercel/next.jsSkill143kyesterdayMITA103Claude Code