qbr-ebr-builder

QBR EBR builder

Build a customer review that connects agreed goals, results, unresolved issues, and decisions about the next period.

A QBR or EBR is a customer-facing review unless the user asks for internal mode. If they want a standalone internal account diagnosis, use account-brief-builder. If they want a one-off executive meeting with an ask, use executive-briefing-builder.

Customer outcome. "Time-to-invoice dropped from 9 days to 4. You still miss the 2-day target you set in January. Decision: fund the AP automation work this quarter, or accept 4 days as the new baseline."

Vendor recap. "This quarter our team delivered 14 enablement sessions, launched two playbooks, and completed three QBRs. We remain committed to your success."

If the customer would hear internal risk language — churn risk, weak champion, discount ceiling — it is not a customer pack.

Inputs

Reuse supplied context first. If a missing company fact would change the result, check the relevant sections of .enablement/context.md when available. Preserve source dates and approval limits.

Ask only for the inputs that change the review:

1. QBR or EBR, audience seniority, and the decisions you want in the room
2. Customer goals and success criteria they already accepted
3. Review period, baseline, and prior-cycle commitments
4. Outcome metrics with source, as-of date, and whether the customer accepts the interpretation
5. Format, and whether they also want an internal prep appendix

If evidence is thin, ask for the smallest blocking set. Do not invent metrics, logos, attribution, pricing, or customer commitments.

Supporting material

Read references/qbr-ebr-structure.md for QBR vs EBR shape, the outcome test, and leakage rules. Skip it if the user already gave an agenda and only wants the narrative filled.

Procedure

1. Name the mode. Customer-facing is the default. Internal prep is a separate appendix, only when asked. Done when you can point to which pages the customer will see.
2. Name the decisions the room must make. Identify the genuine decisions or confirmations needed, proportionate to the review. If the purpose is to validate results or hear changed customer priorities, state that purpose rather than manufacturing an executive ask.
3. Reconcile the scorecard. Each metric: definition, source, as-of date, baseline, current value, evidence confidence. Attribution stays separate. Preserve conflicts. Correlation is not causation.
4. Close the prior loop. Status of last cycle's commitments before any new work. Unconfirmed customer owners stay proposed.
5. Write the outcome narrative. Goals, movement, interpretation, business impact. Cut vendor activity that does not change an outcome they care about.
6. Surface only supported risks and opportunities. Trigger, impact, response. Customer-safe wording in the pack. Internal commercial risk stays in the appendix.
7. Convert to a joint action plan. Customer owner and internal owner on each item. Mark draft, proposed, agreed, or changed. Treat a customer date as a commitment only with confirmation evidence.
8. Leakage check. Check for internal commercial judgments, negotiation limits, confidential commentary, and unsupported attribution. Material delivery problems still belong in the customer discussion, phrased factually with an owner and response.