Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ntygod/ZhiWei --skill github-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ntygod/ZhiWeiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ntygod/zhiwei/github-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ntygod/zhiwei/github-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ntygod/zhiwei/github-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ntygod/zhiwei/github-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ntygod/zhiwei/github-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00757 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00303 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00151 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
github-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
GitHub 协作指南
gh CLI + REST/GraphQL API 管理 GitHub PR / Issue / CI / 代码审查。
适用场景
- PR 创建 / 审查 / 合并
- Issue 创建 / 管理 / 关闭
- CI / Actions 状态查 + 失败排查
- 代码审查（看 diff、留 review comment）
- 远程仓库文件查看与编辑（Contents API）
不适用场景
- 纯本地 Git 操作（commit / branch / log）→
shell_exec/shell_exec - 代码编写本身 → code-assistant
- 其他平台（Gitee / GitLab / Bitbucket）→
shell_exec调对应 CLI 或 API
工作流（按操作分流）
| 操作 | 路径 |
|---|---|
| 本地 commit + push + 创 PR | shell_exec(command="git add ... && git commit -m '...'") → shell_exec(command="git push") → gh pr create |
| 仅 GitHub 侧（看 / 评论 / 合并 PR） | shell_exec + gh pr ... |
| Issue 创建 / 查询 / 评论 | shell_exec + gh issue ... |
| CI 状态 + 失败排查 | shell_exec + gh run list / view --log-failed |
| 代码审查（拉 diff + 留意见） | gh pr diff + gh pr review |
| 远程文件直改（不 clone） | shell_exec + gh api（Contents API） |
| 复杂查询（跨仓 / 批量） | gh api graphql 或 web_fetch GraphQL |
各路径要点：
- CI 通过才合并：合 PR 前
gh pr checks <pr>看全绿 - git 操作走 shell_exec：所有 git 命令（status/diff/log/commit/push 等）统一用
shell_exec执行 - Contents API 整体解码：返回的 Base64 含换行，必须先去空白再整体 base64 解码；逐行解会破坏多字节 UTF-8
- 时间窗口收窄：
since/until限定范围；结果太多缩窗口而不是--paginate - token 走 env：
GITHUB_TOKEN由系统注入，命令里不写明文
详细参考
- gh CLI 命令速查（PR / Issue / CI / 审查）：
{skill_dir}/references/gh-cli-reference.md - Contents API 文件更新（Bash / PowerShell）+ 时间范围查询：
{skill_dir}/references/content-api.md
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 69 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A fa7a4a8c6efa
github-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository ntygod/ZhiWei (137 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 757 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
plugin-code-review-orchestrated
Orchestrates a code review of the spring-plugin repository through scope/context passes, routing, domain reviewer subskills, and per-artifact validation. Use when asked to review a PR, diff, commit, branch, module, or file set, to run a full orchestrated review, or to produce a validated review report.
review-scope-resolver
Normalizes a PR, diff, commit, branch, file list, directory, module, class, or function into an exact review target with semantic clusters and routing signals for domain reviewer subskills. Use as the first pass of an orchestrated code review, when asked to resolve review scope, or when a raw review reference must be…
ghx
Guidance for safe, reliable GitHub CLI workflows across issues, pull requests, and reviews.
github-pr-fix
Fix a GitHub pull request by addressing feedback or CI failures, pushing changes, and publishing replies.
pr-review-comments
Posts review findings from a JSON file as inline comments on a GitHub Pull Request, attaching each comment to its file and line. Use when you have a list/JSON of review findings (each with a file path, line number, and a message such as summary/failurescenario) and want them published on a PR as inline review…
ai-driven-code-editor-cli
OpenCode AI - AI-driven code editor/IDE (CLI/TUI version of Cursor/Windsurf). Use when: (1) AI-assisted coding tasks, (2) Code refactoring with AI, (3) GitHub PR review/fixes, (4) Multi-file edits requiring context, (5) Running AI agents on codebases. NOT for: simple one-line ed…