Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nullhack/temple8 --skill interview-building-blocksgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nullhack/temple8Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nullhack/temple8/interview-building-blocks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nullhack/temple8/interview-building-blocks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nullhack/temple8/interview-building-blocks/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nullhack/temple8/interview-building-blocks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nullhack/temple8/interview-building-blocks.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00431 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00172 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00086 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
interview-building-blocks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Interview (Building Blocks)
- Load [[requirements/domain-decomposition]], [[requirements/aggregate-boundaries]], [[architecture/quality-attributes]], [[methodology/simplicity-discipline]] — gap analysis, boundary sizing, the quality-attribute taxonomy the coverage check runs over, and the simplicity discipline. This level is structural decomposition, not CIT/Laddering elicitation (those served levels 1–2).
- Read the running interview-notes; append the building-block names and boundaries to it.
- Capture building-block NAMES and rough boundaries ONLY — no detailed spec (rules, examples, criteria come later in planning). The purpose is to know WHAT building blocks exist, not to specify each.
- Ask the simplicity question for each block: "Is this building block load-bearing, or could it collapse into a neighbour?" A block with no unique responsibility a cited need requires is speculative per [[methodology/simplicity-discipline]] — flag it for collapse into a neighbour or drop at consolidation. A block the cited need requires but no current block covers is a gap, flagged here (not silently filled).
- Flag rework: IF a finding implies MODIFYING an existing block's behaviour (not adding a new one) THEN mark that block in the decomposition table as
rework — modifies existing <block>and record the stakeholder's CIT-grounded reason. This is a requirements-level observation only — discovery does not touch tests. Plan reads these flags atauthor-test-stubsand marks the matching existing tests@pytest.mark.pendingso the build backlog picks them up as rework per [[software-craft/tdd]]. A finding with no such flag is new work. - Run gap analysis: IF a bounded context from cross-cutting maps to no block THEN flag the gap; IF a quality attribute maps to no block THEN flag the gap. Do not silently fill gaps per [[requirements/domain-decomposition]], [[requirements/aggregate-boundaries]].
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 14 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 18c9f9a223f3
interview-building-blocks is a skill published in the GitHub repository nullhack/temple8 (11 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 431 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
agentic-test-audit
Audit a pytest suite: surviving mutants and untested code, flaky, order-dependent and slow tests, and removal candidates checked on held-out mutants. Report-only.
agentic-verify
Check that a Python change is caught by tests: run every mutant of the changed lines and write tests until they catch them. Reports evidence instead of a diff to read.
test-generator
Generate pytest test cases for Python functions and classes.
python
Use when the task is Python itself, in any framework or none: PEP 695 generics, mypy --strict typing, dataclass/Protocol/TypedDict/Enum choices, asyncio.TaskGroup, stdlib idioms, src/ layout + pyproject.toml with uv, ruff+mypy+pytest gate. NOT a FastAPI/ASGI service (that is fastapi), NOT a deep pytest suite (that is…
clawrium-release-announcements
Daily — draft a release blog post, open a PR, iterate on comments until merged.
blog-author
Watch ric03uec/clawrium release tags; draft a short blog post per user-visible feature as a PR against blog/.