Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add NVIDIA-TAO/tao-skill-bank --skill tao-analyze-gaps-vlm-bcqgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NVIDIA-TAO/tao-skill-bankWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nvidia-tao/tao-skill-bank/tao-analyze-gaps-vlm-bcq)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nvidia-tao/tao-skill-bank/tao-analyze-gaps-vlm-bcq"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nvidia-tao/tao-skill-bank/tao-analyze-gaps-vlm-bcq/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nvidia-tao/tao-skill-bank/tao-analyze-gaps-vlm-bcq"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nvidia-tao/tao-skill-bank/tao-analyze-gaps-vlm-bcq.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00083 | $0.01305 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00042 | $0.00652 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00261 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00130 |
Grade A, and why
tao-analyze-gaps-vlm-bcq scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 117 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
VLM Binary Classification Gap Analysis
Standalone install? If this session was not initialized by the TAO skill bank plugin, run the
tao-setupskill first (host preflight, credentials, cross-skill discovery).
Reads a VLM predictions JSON, compares each model response against ground truth, and writes FP/FN failure cases to a JSONL file with a summary report. Run it with a TAO Data Services spec file; the data-services entrypoint requires -e <spec>.
Purpose
After running a VLM on a binary yes/no evaluation task, the predictions need to be compared against ground truth to identify failure cases. This skill produces a structured list of FP (false positive) and FN (false negative) samples that downstream RCCA stages (e.g., cosmos generation, root cause analysis) consume to drive a DEFT iteration.
Usage
Generate a vlm_bcq_spec.yaml with the bundled helper:
python3 skills/data/tao-analyze-gaps-vlm-bcq/scripts/prepare_vlm_bcq_spec.py \
--predictions-json /path/to/results.json \
--videos-dir /path/to/videos/root \
--results-dir /path/to/output/gaps \
--output-spec /path/to/output/gaps/vlm_bcq_spec.yaml
Omit --videos-dir when prediction video_id values are already absolute. The generated spec has this shape:
predictions_json: /path/to/results.json
videos_dir: ""
results_dir: /path/to/output/gaps
Set videos_dir when video_id values in the predictions are relative paths:
predictions_json: /path/to/results.json
videos_dir: /path/to/videos/root
results_dir: /path/to/output/gaps
Invoke the vlm_bcq action inside the TAO Toolkit data services container with -e <spec>:
gap_analysis vlm_bcq -e /path/to/vlm_bcq_spec.yaml
Request exactly one GPU from the selected platform (compute_shape.gpus: 1,
compute_shape.nodes: 1). VLM BCQ gap analysis does not perform GPU compute,
but the Data Services image always calls nvidia-smi and fails when no GPU is
visible. One is a GPU count, not a device ID; the platform selects the device.
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 117 lines · 83 tokens per session scan A b41e8130cadf
tao-analyze-gaps-vlm-bcq is a skill published in the GitHub repository NVIDIA-TAO/tao-skill-bank (88 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 83 tokens to every session and 1,305 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
evalscope
LLM evaluation & inference performance testing via the evalscope CLI. Translates natural language requests into evalscope commands for: (1) Model accuracy evaluation — runs registered benchmarks against local checkpoints or API endpoints (OpenAI-compatible, Anthropic, LiteLLM); (2) Performance stress testing — TTFT…
ai-engineering-toolkit
6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.
evaluating-code-models
Evaluates code generation models across HumanEval, MBPP, MultiPL-E, and 15+ benchmarks with pass@k metrics. Use when benchmarking code models, comparing coding abilities, testing multi-language support, or measuring code generation quality. Industry standard from BigCode Project used by HuggingFace leaderboards.
prompt-optimization
Improve a prompt on the evaluations workbench through a measured loop. Score the baseline first, then duplicate the target column, form a hypothesis from failing rows, edit the copy's prompt draft, run, compare pass rate and cost, and repeat until the numbers hold. Use when the user asks to optimize or improve a…
trulens-evaluation-setup
Configure feedback functions and selectors for TruLens evaluations.
llm-as-judge-evaluation
Evaluate LLM outputs using frontier models as judges. Use for pairwise model comparison, quality scoring with custom rubrics, and automated evaluation pipelines. Covers position bias mitigation, statistical significance, and generating preference data for DPO/RLHF.