verify-checkpoint

verify-checkpoint is a skill for Claude Code from NVZver/claude-marketplace. It costs 157 tokens per session (3,657 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A checkpoint grader that checks one completed piece of work against a specification and returns either CLEAR or BLOCK.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it through a delegating agent for each checkpoint, or run it in a self-paced loop that checks for new checkpoint signals.
Why use it?
It provides a focused gate after an implementer finishes one required increment, helping decide whether work can continue.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Part of the observer plugin — 2 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it through a delegating agent for each checkpoint, or run it in a self-paced loop that checks for new checkpoint signals.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/nvzver/claude-marketplace/verify-checkpoint
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add NVZver/claude-marketplace --skill verify-checkpoint
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NVZver/claude-marketplace

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install observer, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 2 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for verify-checkpoint

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nvzver/claude-marketplace/verify-checkpoint/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nvzver/claude-marketplace/verify-checkpoint)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nvzver/claude-marketplace/verify-checkpoint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nvzver/claude-marketplace/verify-checkpoint/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for verify-checkpoint

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nvzver/claude-marketplace/verify-checkpoint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nvzver/claude-marketplace/verify-checkpoint.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 157 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,657 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00157 $0.03657
Opus 5 $0.00078 $0.01828
Sonnet 5 $0.00031 $0.00731
Haiku 4.5 $0.00016 $0.00366

Measured 10d ago against content hash f10f4efdecbf, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

verify-checkpoint scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

observer/skills/verify-checkpoint/SKILL.md · 104 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 104 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Trace. On load, print first: =============== [observer/skills/verify-checkpoint/SKILL.md] [observer] ===============

Verify Checkpoint

Grader Actor — the second Actor in the observer module, sibling to observe. Where observe coaches through a role, this Actor gates. Its core unit of work is grading one signalled increment: on a checkpoint signal an implementer emits when it pauses having completed one F-requirement, it grades that single increment against the spec on two of reconcile's three checks — does · only — and emits a CLEAR or BLOCK verdict.

That grading logic is the spine, and it is identical across two invocation modes — the mode is only the entry point:

  • (a) Per-increment dispatch (first-class) — the delegating context (lsa:delegate) dispatches this Actor once per signalled increment via the Agent tool; the Actor grades that one increment and returns the verdict. No loop is started.
  • (b) Standalone /loop rider — this Actor rides the substrate's self-paced /loop (omit the interval to self-pace) and, on each wake, checks for a checkpoint signal, grading each signalled increment as it wakes.

In /loop mode it rides the existing loop; it does not build a scheduler (../../../.lsa/VISION.md principle 9, Substrate-native first).

This is not lsa:verify. lsa:verify is the before-delegation grounding check (is the spec ready to hand to an implementer). This Actor is an after-the-increment check (did the increment the implementer just finished conform), scoped to one F-requirement — the per-increment analogue of lsa:reconcile, which grades the whole plan at the end. It applies does · only only; the third check, all (whole-plan completeness), stays with the final lsa:reconcile (../../../lsa/skills/reconcile/SKILL.md:35).

The checkpoint-signal contract

Read the full file on GitHub · 104 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 104 lines · 157 tokens per session scan A f10f4efdecbf

Subscribe to this mod's changes

verify-checkpoint is a skill published in the GitHub repository NVZver/claude-marketplace (1 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 157 tokens to every session and 3,657 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

improve-code-quality

Guided journey from a working-but-untested vibe-coded prototype to a production-ready product with tests, clean structure, a business-rules boundary, and resilience at scale. Orchestrates nine skills phase by phase - working-with-legacy-code, clean-code, refactoring-patterns, software-design-philosophy…

wondelai/skills · 227 tokens

refactoring-patterns

Apply named refactoring transformations to improve code structure without changing behavior. Use when the user mentions "refactor this", "code smells", "extract method", "replace conditional", "technical debt", "move method", "inline variable", "decompose conditional", or "clean up this messy code". Also trigger when…

wondelai/skills · 125 tokens

team-review

Review changed code for reuse, quality, and efficiency using a team of persistent named reviewers. This skill should be used when the user says "team review", "review with team", or wants parallel code review with persistent team members for follow-up questions. Similar to /subagent-review but reviewers persist after…

NikiforovAll/claude-code-rules · 65 tokens

roslyn-query

Query .NET/C# codebases using Roslyn AST analysis via dotnet run file. Use for tracing data flow, auditing API usage, finding pattern violations, or ad-hoc codebase queries.

NikiforovAll/claude-code-rules · 44 tokens

review-responder

Use when receiving feedback on code you implemented, responding to reviewer comments, deciding which review suggestions to implement, or pushing back on incorrect review feedback.

Joncik91/ucai · 33 tokens

codex

Route a task to OpenAI's Codex CLI (codex exec) instead of doing it yourself. Use this skill ANY time the user names codex or types /codex — even for routine work Claude could handle, because the user is choosing to delegate. The intent: 'ask codex', 'have codex review/refactor this', 'check/validate with codex', 'see…

sparklingneuronics/sparkling-skills · 249 tokens