Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add obielin/responsible-ai-skills --skill alignment-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/obielin/responsible-ai-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/obielin/responsible-ai-skills/alignment-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/obielin/responsible-ai-skills/alignment-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/obielin/responsible-ai-skills/alignment-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/obielin/responsible-ai-skills/alignment-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/obielin/responsible-ai-skills/alignment-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.01367 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00683 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00273 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00137 |
Grade A, and why
alignment-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 207 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Alignment Review
This is the last skill you run before declaring any AI work complete. It is a structured self-audit that catches responsible AI failures before they reach production or users.
You cannot mark this task done until every section is answered.
Section 1: Goal Alignment
The system must do what it was asked to do — and only that.
What was the original goal or requirement?
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────
[Write it here from memory, without looking at the spec]
Now check: does your implementation match?
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────
[ ] The system solves the stated problem
[ ] The system does not do anything beyond the stated problem
[ ] There are no undocumented side effects or data accesses
[ ] The system's scope has not expanded during implementation without approval
If any box is unchecked: stop. Discuss with the requester before proceeding.
Section 2: Fairness and Bias
[ ] bias-assessment skill was completed and findings documented
[ ] fairness-testing skill was completed and all tests are passing in CI
[ ] Disaggregated performance metrics are recorded
[ ] No protected group has performance below the defined minimum threshold
[ ] The bias assessment findings are committed to docs/
If any test is failing: you may not ship. Fix the model first.
Run the verification:
pytest -m fairness -v
All tests must pass. Green only.
Section 3: Explainability
[ ] explainability-by-default skill was completed
[ ] Every prediction or decision the system makes can be explained
[ ] The explanation has been reviewed by a non-technical person and understood
[ ] The explanation is accessible to the people affected by the decision
[ ] Limitations of the explanation are documented
Spot-check:
# Run this on 5 random test cases
for i in range(5):
sample = test_df.sample(1)
explanation = model.explain(sample)
assert explanation['plain_english'] != ""
print(f"Case {i}: {explanation['plain_english']}")
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 207 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 6ffe3f467ed7
alignment-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository obielin/responsible-ai-skills (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 1,367 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review-with-lsp
Code review with LSP-powered code intelligence. Uses MCP tools (diagnostics, hover, references, definition, symbols) for semantic code understanding, not just text grep.
vue-best-practices
A review checklist for Vue 2 and Vue 3 components, covering component names, prop declarations, TypeScript casts, API styles and complex template expressions.
rust-review
A Rust code-review skill for services, checking for crashes, unsafe SQL construction, exposed credentials, ignored errors, and unfinished code.
ts-review
A TypeScript code-review skill for projects that keep multiple packages in one repository. Such a repository is called a monorepo.
review-skill
Inspect, safely test, and assess one Runx skill package for capability, trust, and operator readiness. Use when deciding whether to adopt, improve, reject, install, or publish a skill; its evidence-only assess runner is available when native test evidence already exists.
github-pr-comment
Post one exact GitHub pull-request comment through local gh, any compatible hosted connector, or the explicit human-gated MCP composition, with retry safety and independent readback.