Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add oborchers/fractional-cto --skill declaration-ordergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oborchers/fractional-ctoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/oborchers/fractional-cto/declaration-order)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oborchers/fractional-cto/declaration-order"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oborchers/fractional-cto/declaration-order/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oborchers/fractional-cto/declaration-order"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oborchers/fractional-cto/declaration-order.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.03494 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.01398 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00699 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00349 |
Grade A, and why
declaration-order scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 477 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Every File Has the Same Shape
A developer opening any file in your project should know where to look without searching. Constants at the top. Types next. Then classes. Then functions. Then the entry point. Every file. Every time. No exceptions.
When a codebase has no consistent declaration order, every file is a treasure hunt. The reader ctrl-F's for the class definition, scrolls past a helper function wedged between two constants, finds a type alias buried after the main function, and wonders if the person who wrote this was shuffling a deck of cards. This is not an organizational preference — it is a readability debt that compounds with every file added to the project.
The rules below establish a universal shape for files and classes. The specific language idioms vary; the principle does not.
File-Level Ordering
Every file follows this top-to-bottom sequence. Items that do not apply to a given file are simply absent — the order of what remains does not change.
1. Module docstring / file header comment
2. Imports (per the import-discipline skill)
3. Constants / module-level configuration
4. Type definitions / interfaces / type aliases
5. Classes
6. Module-level functions
7. Main / entry point (if applicable)
Why this order:
- Docstring first because the reader needs context before seeing code
- Imports second because they are the table of contents (see import-discipline)
- Constants third because they are referenced by everything below — defining them after the code that uses them forces the reader to jump upward
- Types fourth because classes and functions depend on them — a function signature referencing a type that is defined 200 lines later is a navigation failure
- Classes fifth because they are structural, self-contained units
- Functions sixth because they are the primary operations that use the types and constants above
- Entry point last because it is the culmination — it calls everything above, so it belongs at the bottom where the reader has already seen all dependencies
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 477 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 5c3e9dfb2946
declaration-order is a skill published in the GitHub repository oborchers/fractional-cto (32 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 3,494 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-13.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…