Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add oborchers/fractional-cto --skill go-pedantrygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oborchers/fractional-ctoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/oborchers/fractional-cto/go-pedantry)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oborchers/fractional-cto/go-pedantry"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oborchers/fractional-cto/go-pedantry/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oborchers/fractional-cto/go-pedantry"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oborchers/fractional-cto/go-pedantry.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00071 | $0.03565 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.01426 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00713 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00357 |
Grade A, and why
go-pedantry scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 434 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Go Is Opinionated -- So Are We
Go is a language that already has strong opinions: gofmt, short variable names, explicit error handling, no exceptions. But the language's opinions stop at syntax. How you wrap errors, design interfaces, name packages, order struct fields, and configure your linter -- these are decisions Go leaves to you. This skill makes those decisions for you, because inconsistency in these areas is what turns a Go codebase from clean to chaotic.
Error Wrapping: Always %w, Never %s or %v
When wrapping an error with fmt.Errorf, ALWAYS use %w. This preserves the error chain so that errors.Is() and errors.As() work. Using %s or %v converts the error to a string and destroys the chain. This is not a style preference -- it is the difference between errors that can be programmatically handled and errors that can only be logged.
// BAD -- error chain is destroyed, errors.Is() will not work
func GetUser(ctx context.Context, id string) (*User, error) {
user, err := db.QueryUser(ctx, id)
if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to get user %s: %s", id, err.Error())
}
return user, nil
}
// BAD -- %v also destroys the chain
func GetUser(ctx context.Context, id string) (*User, error) {
user, err := db.QueryUser(ctx, id)
if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to get user %s: %v", id, err)
}
return user, nil
}
// GOOD -- %w preserves the error chain
func GetUser(ctx context.Context, id string) (*User, error) {
user, err := db.QueryUser(ctx, id)
if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("getting user %s: %w", id, err)
}
return user, nil
}
// Now callers can inspect the error chain:
user, err := GetUser(ctx, "usr_123")
if errors.Is(err, sql.ErrNoRows) {
// handle not found
}
Error message conventions:
- Start with a lowercase verb in gerund form: "getting user", "parsing config", "connecting to database"
- Do NOT start with "failed to" or "error" -- the fact that it is an error is already clear from the context
- Add identifying information: IDs, names, paths -- whatever helps debug the issue
- Keep it terse:
"getting user %s: %w"not"an error occurred while attempting to retrieve the user with ID %s from the database: %w"
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 434 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A 0a419ad668cf
go-pedantry is a skill published in the GitHub repository oborchers/fractional-cto (32 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 3,565 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-13.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr-to-go-linter
Generate a new pkg/linters analyzer from a merged or open PR pattern.
golang-refactoring
Golang refactoring — safe, at-scale restructuring of existing Go code: a coverage-adaptive safety net, behavior-preserving transforms (gopls Rename/Extract, gofmt -r, gopatch), the Fowler catalog mapped to Go, breaking import cycles, and small stacked PRs. Apply when a function or type has grown too large, a code…
design-review
Deep design review of Go codebase — naming, structure, consistency, interfaces, error handling. Scores each dimension and provides actionable fixes.
agents-md
Generate AGENTS.md files for Go, Rust, TypeScript, and Java projects. Use this skill whenever the user asks to create, scaffold, bootstrap, update, or review an AGENTS.md (or agent-instructions, CLAUDE.md, repo guide for agents) file in a codebase. Also trigger when the user says "add AGENTS.md", "make this repo…
ring:verifying-code
Verifying a Go project: runs every quality check (lint, vet, imports, format, docs, unit, integration, E2E) and returns a single MERGEREADY or NEEDSFIX verdict. Report-only: never fixes anything. Use for a quick pre-merge or pre-PR check outside a full dev-cycle. Skip when not a Go project, when you want a single…
go-concurrency-safety
L1 supplement - audits Go-specific concurrency hazards in node client code: map iteration non-determinism, goroutine leaks, mutex ordering, panic boundaries, context cancellation.