Superpowers is a software development methodology for coding agents that guides work from clarifying requirements through design, planning, implementation, testing, and review. It is for developers who want agents to follow a structured, test-focused process using composable skills and subagents.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add obra/superpowers --skill test-driven-developmentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/obra/superpowersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/obra/superpowers/test-driven-development)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/obra/superpowers/test-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/obra/superpowers/test-driven-development/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/obra/superpowers/test-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/obra/superpowers/test-driven-development.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.02340 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00936 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00468 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00234 |
Grade A, and why
test-driven-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 26d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- test-driven-development — 100% identical, 10 lines differ
- test-driven-development — 100% identical, 10 lines differ
- test-driven-development — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- test-driven-development — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- test-driven-development — 100% identical, 10 lines differ
- test-driven-development — 100% identical, 10 lines differ
- test-driven-development — 100% identical, 10 lines differ
- test-driven-development — 100% identical, 6 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 331 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test-Driven Development (TDD)
Overview
Write the test first. Watch it fail. Write minimal code to pass.
Core principle: If you didn't watch the test fail, you don't know if it tests the right thing.
Violating the letter of the rules is violating the spirit of the rules.
When to Use
Always:
- New features
- Bug fixes
- Refactoring
- Behavior changes
Exceptions (ask your human partner):
- Throwaway prototypes
- Generated code
- Configuration files
Thinking "skip TDD just this once"? Stop. That's rationalization.
The Iron Law
NO PRODUCTION CODE WITHOUT A FAILING TEST FIRST
Write code before the test? Delete it. Start over.
No exceptions:
- Don't keep it as "reference"
- Don't "adapt" it while writing tests
- Don't look at it
- Delete means delete
Implement fresh from tests. Period.
Red-Green-Refactor
digraph tdd_cycle {
rankdir=LR;
red [label="RED\nWrite failing test", shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor="#ffcccc"];
verify_red [label="Verify fails\ncorrectly", shape=diamond];
green [label="GREEN\nMinimal code", shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor="#ccffcc"];
verify_green [label="Verify passes\nAll green", shape=diamond];
refactor [label="REFACTOR\nClean up", shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor="#ccccff"];
next [label="Next", shape=ellipse];
red -> verify_red;
verify_red -> green [label="yes"];
verify_red -> red [label="wrong\nfailure"];
green -> verify_green;
verify_green -> refactor [label="yes"];
verify_green -> green [label="no"];
refactor -> verify_green [label="stay\ngreen"];
verify_green -> next;
next -> red;
}
RED - Write Failing Test
Write one minimal test showing what should happen.
const result = await retryOperation(operation);
expect(result).toBe('success'); expect(attempts).toBe(3); });
Clear name, tests real behavior, one thing
</Good>
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 26d ago Changed · +10 lines 64b03fce4aee
- 1mo ago First seen · 321 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A bf1b8216e523
test-driven-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository obra/superpowers (299,875 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 2,340 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
tdd
You MUST use this when implementing testable behavior changes - new features, bug fixes, or refactors with observable contracts. Covers writing meaningful failing tests before implementation and verifying behavior through the red-green-refactor cycle. Not for purely mechanical edits without behavior changes.
laravel-tdd
Drives Laravel feature development with Pest or PHPUnit — factories, RefreshDatabase, fakes for queues/mail/notifications, Sanctum auth, and Inertia assertions. Use when writing or fixing a Laravel controller, Eloquent model, policy, job, or notification, when the project uses Pest/PHPUnit, or when asked to test an…
php-codeigniter-tdd
Drives CodeIgniter 4 test development — CIUnitTestCase, DatabaseTestTrait's migrate/refresh/seed lifecycle, the dedicated tests database group, and FeatureTestTrait for HTTP-level assertions. Use when writing or fixing a CodeIgniter 4 test, when a test touches the database, or when a test suite is unexpectedly slow or…
test-driven-development
Drives development with tests written before implementation code, in Go, TypeScript, PHP, or any language. Use when implementing new logic or behavior, fixing a reported bug (write the reproduction test first), modifying existing functionality, or when asked to "add a test," "TDD this," or "prove this works." Use even…
issue-driven-development
Use for any development work - the master 13-step coding process that orchestrates all other skills, ensuring GitHub issue tracking, proper branching, TDD, code review, and CI verification.
tdd-full-coverage
Use when implementing features or fixes - test-driven development with RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle and full code coverage requirement.