Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add odere-pro/claude-oop-excellence --skill auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/odere-pro/claude-oop-excellenceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/odere-pro/claude-oop-excellence/audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/odere-pro/claude-oop-excellence/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/odere-pro/claude-oop-excellence/audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/odere-pro/claude-oop-excellence/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/odere-pro/claude-oop-excellence/audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00184 | $0.02749 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00092 | $0.01375 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00550 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00275 |
Grade A, and why
audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 194 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Quality, Risk & Design Audit
/audit is THE read-only analysis entry point for this plugin. It subsumes every separate
analysis path — there is one front door, one selector grammar, and one unified report. It resolves a
selector against the glossary, delegates the heavy lifting to the oop-orchestrator, and returns a
single merged report. It assumes nothing about the language or stack and never modifies code.
The plugin organizes analysis across two tracks and zooms through three layers — track → aspect → family / category / entity:
- RISK track — find problems: code smells, antipatterns, vulnerabilities, supply-chain risks.
- PATTERN track — work with design patterns: detect patterns already present (
pattern-scan) and suggest the most-suitable patterns where one would help (pattern-fit).
A full /audit runs both tracks in parallel and merges them into ONE report.
Selector grammar
/audit [full | changed | component <path>] → L1: both tracks, in parallel, one report
/audit risks [scope] → L2: RISK track only
/audit patterns [scope] → L2: PATTERN track (scan + fit)
/audit pattern-scan [scope] → aspect: patterns already present
/audit pattern-fit [scope] → aspect: most-suitable pattern suggestions
/audit <category> [scope] → one issue/pattern category
/audit <family> [scope] → one family of issues or patterns
/audit <entity-id> [scope] → one entity or pattern
Every form takes an optional scope suffix — full (default), changed, or component <path>.
What to look for (selector, default = both tracks)
The glossary is the single source of truth for what the plugin recognizes. A selector resolves against it, zooming from the broadest layer (a whole track) to the narrowest (one entity):
full/changed/component <path>/ none — the L1 full run: the RISK track and the PATTERN track dispatched in parallel, merged into one unified report. (A bare scope word with no selector is the full run scoped accordingly.)risks— the RISK track only (its sole aspect isrisk-scan): every issue family (oop,code,architecture,testing,concurrency,database,security,dependency).patterns— the PATTERN track: both aspects,pattern-scan+pattern-fit.pattern-scan— one aspect: design patterns already present in the code.pattern-fit— one aspect: the most-suitable patterns where one would help.<category>— one category of entities (e.g.vulnerability,antipattern,code-smell,supply-chain-risk,design-pattern).<family>— one family of issues or patterns (e.g.oop,security,behavioral).oopis the spine of this plugin — it surfaces whenever class/struct/interface declarations are present.<entity-id>— a single glossary entity or pattern, by its stable id (e.g.god-class,feature-envy,strategy).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 194 lines · 184 tokens per session scan A f0a7c37273f4
audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository odere-pro/claude-oop-excellence (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 184 tokens to every session and 2,749 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Review code against enterprise standards — auto-detects stack (.NET, NestJS, React, RN, Flutter).
architecture-review
Review layer separation, design patterns, DI, and module boundaries.
pr-review
Review current branch changes — reads git diff, runs stack-appropriate review, outputs structured feedback.
recipe-front-review
Reviews completed frontend implementation for governing-source compliance, scope economy, repository quality, and security, then applies user-approved React corrections.
new-skill
Scaffold a new brooks-lint analysis skill so it passes npm run validate and npm run evals on the first try — generates skills/{name}/SKILL.md (with the mandatory "Do NOT trigger for:" clause and a Process section citing guide step ranges) plus skills/{name}/{name}-guide.md (sequentially numbered steps), then appends…
release
Cut a brooks-lint release: set the version in package.json, propagate it across all four plugin manifests and every version-bearing text file (README badges, docs site metadata), write the CHANGELOG entry, validate, then commit, push, tag, and publish the GitHub release. Triggers when the maintainer asks to "release"…