plan

A skill for creating a written operations work plan before execution. It researches the project's current files and history, then records objectives, steps, deliverables, and success criteria for approval.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to plan research, strategy, content, specifications, and other non-code tasks. It creates or updates dated plan files and links the plan to the project's backlog and state.
Why use it?
It prevents planning from ignoring existing work, decisions, or project context and gives the user a chance to approve the approach first.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/odinmb/ops-workflow/plan
Any agent
npx skills add OdinMB/ops-workflow --skill plan
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OdinMB/ops-workflow

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 24 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 751 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00024 $0.00751
Opus 5 $0.00012 $0.00376
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00150
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00075

Measured 2d ago against content hash ea2c3b1f3473, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/plan/SKILL.md · 64 lines

What it actually says

Create a work plan for the following task: $ARGUMENTS

Instructions

  1. Research first. Read MEMORY.md, backlog/INDEX.md, and any relevant state/ or references/ files to understand current state and prior work. Check plans/completed/ for related past tasks. Check backlog/ for an existing draft plan that matches this task.

  2. Create or activate the plan file. If a draft plan exists in backlog/, move it to plans/, update its date to today, and set status to active. Refine the plan based on your research. If no draft exists, write a new file at plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md where the slug is a short kebab-case name derived from the task. Use today's date. Use this format:

# Task: <Descriptive Name>

- **Date**: YYYY-MM-DD
- **Status**: active

## Objective
What we're trying to accomplish and why. Be specific.

## Plan
1. Step one
2. Step two
3. ...

**Artifacts:** Where deliverables will be stored (e.g. `artifacts/`, `artifacts/<subfolder>/`).

**Files to create/modify:** List every file and folder expected to be created, moved, or significantly changed — including which `INDEX.md` files will need updating.

**Success criteria:**
- [ ] Criterion A
- [ ] Criterion B

Leave the sections below the plan blank — they get filled in during and after execution:

## Outcome
_Fill in when completed._

## Key Decisions
_Fill in when completed._

## Artifacts
_Fill in when completed._

## Session Log
_Fill in when completed._
  1. Present and clarify. Assume the user hasn't read the research and doesn't know this corner of the project. One or two sentences each: what the situation is, what the work will produce, and what it deliberately won't cover. No numbered walkthrough of the steps and no success-criteria checklist — those stay in the plan file for the executor.

    Then surface the scope decisions, trade-offs, and assumptions that genuinely need the user. Use the AskUserQuestion tool with concrete options — don't ask open-ended questions when specific choices are available, and make every option differ in something the user can judge without opening a file: what the deliverable achieves, who it's for, what it costs, what it rules out later. Group related decisions (up to 4 per question).

    Decide artifact placement yourself using the Whole-File Test in CLAUDE.md and state where things will land in a clause — never ask which folder. Skip clarification if the task is absolutely straightforward. Update the plan file with the user's answers. Wait for approval before any work begins.

  2. Do NOT execute the plan. This skill only creates and proposes the plan. Execution happens via the /execute skill after the user approves.

  3. Scope check. Plans in non-code repos must never include implementing code changes. This workflow produces content, research, specs, and briefs — not code. If a task involves building something in an app, the plan should cover producing the content/spec/brief that the user takes to the coding repo.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 64 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A ea2c3b1f3473

Subscribe to this mod's changes

plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository OdinMB/ops-workflow (7 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 751 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

knowledge-gaps

This skill should be used when the user asks about 'knowledge gaps', 'tool coverage', 'undocumented dependencies', 'undocumented tools', 'concept gaps', 'installed plugins', 'plugin coverage', 'undocumented skills', 'globally installed plugins/skills', 'what is installed on this machine', 'stale/outdated/drifted…

voxpelli/vp-claude · 185 tokens

dev-finish

Close out a session — summarise what changed, capture what was learned, and prepare the commit.

ToruAI/toru-claude-agents · 24 tokens

dev-full-auto

Hand over a spec and walk away — plans, builds, tests and audits on its own, stopping only at a real blocker.

ToruAI/toru-claude-agents · 30 tokens

people-intel

This skill should be used when the user asks to 'research person', 'person intel', 'people intel', 'who is [person]', 'who created [project]', 'who maintains [package]', 'add person to knowledge graph', 'enrich person note', 'update person note', 'document [person]', 'create person note for [name]'. Researches a…

voxpelli/vp-claude · 118 tokens

dev-cycle

Run a feature end to end — scout the code, plan it, build it, and keep a session file so a closed terminal doesn't lose the thread.

ToruAI/toru-claude-agents · 34 tokens

factory-api

API conventions for both server actions and tRPC builds. Covers the decision between them, per-mutation Zod input schemas, central router composition, pagination shape, multi-field search via Drizzle ilike + or(), mutation lifecycle hooks, conditional query enabling, stale-time defaults, error response shape and…

nonlinear-xyz/factory-kit · 95 tokens