seo-content

SEO Content

Purpose

Create evidence-led content audits, briefs, and draft improvements that help a real reader complete a task. Use this after an approved seo-action-plan when the request stems from AEO/GEO findings; use it directly for a bounded editorial review with supplied content and facts.

Read references/editorial-brief-protocol.md before preparing a formal brief or draft. Read snippet-copy-protocol.md when title or meta-description copy is part of the deliverable.

Input gate

Ask for or inspect the page/content capture, intended reader and decision/task, locale, page purpose, current factual sources, and any relevant approved action-plan item. Treat a missing fact, source, audience, or locale as an explicit limitation instead of filling it with plausible copy.

For regulated, health, legal, financial, safety, pricing, availability, or comparative claims, require an owner-approved source and human review. Do not use a search snippet, an AI answer, or a competitor page as proof of a claim.

Workflow

1. Frame the job. Identify the reader’s task, search/referral context if known, page type, conversion or information goal, language/region, and what the page must not claim.
2. Build a claim ledger. Separate verified facts, interpretation, customer proof, quotations, and unknowns. Pin each factual claim to a supplied source or flag it for verification.
3. Diagnose usefulness. Review whether the page answers the actual task, makes ownership and scope clear, offers original evidence or experience where relevant, explains limitations, and is navigable on a small screen. Describe observations; do not assign an E-E-A-T, readability, word-count, or “AI readiness” score.
4. Create the brief and query contract. Define the answer/decision the reader needs, primary need/query family, natural supporting language, evidence to show, proposed hierarchy, necessary comparison/steps, entities, internal destinations that are known to exist, media/accessibility needs, locale constraints, CTA, and review owner. Choose headings and metadata for clarity, not fixed character, keyword-density, or passage-length formulas.
5. Write complete search-result copy when requested. Produce the actual unique title and meta-description candidate, not “improve metadata” as a placeholder. The description must identify the page, communicate the useful outcome, include a truthful differentiator or concrete page-specific detail, and retain any material qualifier. Rewrite descriptions that are generic, duplicated, fragmentary, or too short to explain why this result fits the query; do not pad them to hit a character count.
6. Draft only within approved scope. Supply rewrite options or an implementation-ready draft only from the claim ledger. Keep placeholders unmistakable. Preserve meaningful nuance; do not pad, paraphrase sources mechanically, or manufacture first-hand experience, reviews, citations, author credentials, data, or quotes.
7. Set acceptance and verification. Specify a human fact/brand/legal review, rendered-page review, title/meta uniqueness and source-data check, link check, accessibility check, and a source-appropriate measurement plan. A visible answer or structured layout may improve clarity; it does not guarantee ranking, retrieval, citation, traffic, or conversion.