Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Ohh-889/skyroc. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Ohh-889/skyroc/master/.agents/skills/component-refactoring/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Ohh-889/skyrocWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ohh-889/skyroc/component-refactoring)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ohh-889/skyroc/component-refactoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ohh-889/skyroc/component-refactoring/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ohh-889/skyroc/component-refactoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ohh-889/skyroc/component-refactoring.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00093 | $0.03490 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00037 | $0.01396 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00698 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00349 |
Grade A, and why
component-refactoring scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- component-refactoring — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 484 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Dify Component Refactoring Skill
Refactor high-complexity React components in the Dify frontend codebase with the patterns and workflow below.
Complexity Threshold: Components with complexity > 50 (measured by
pnpm analyze-component) should be refactored before testing.
Quick Reference
Commands (run from web/)
Use paths relative to web/ (e.g., app/components/...).
Use refactor-component for refactoring prompts and analyze-component for testing prompts and metrics.
cd web
# Generate refactoring prompt
pnpm refactor-component <path>
# Output refactoring analysis as JSON
pnpm refactor-component <path> --json
# Generate testing prompt (after refactoring)
pnpm analyze-component <path>
# Output testing analysis as JSON
pnpm analyze-component <path> --json
Complexity Analysis
# Analyze component complexity
pnpm analyze-component <path> --json
# Key metrics to check:
# - complexity: normalized score 0-100 (target < 50)
# - maxComplexity: highest single function complexity
# - lineCount: total lines (target < 300)
Complexity Score Interpretation
| Score | Level | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 0-25 | 🟢 Simple | Ready for testing |
| 26-50 | 🟡 Medium | Consider minor refactoring |
| 51-75 | 🟠 Complex | Refactor before testing |
| 76-100 | 🔴 Very Complex | Must refactor |
Core Refactoring Patterns
Pattern 1: Extract Custom Hooks
When: Component has complex state management, multiple useState/useEffect, or business logic mixed with UI.
Dify Convention: Place hooks in a hooks/ subdirectory or alongside the component as use-<feature>.ts.
// ❌ Before: Complex state logic in component
const Configuration: FC = () => {
const [modelConfig, setModelConfig] = useState<ModelConfig>(...)
const [datasetConfigs, setDatasetConfigs] = useState<DatasetConfigs>(...)
const [completionParams, setCompletionParams] = useState<FormValue>({})
// 50+ lines of state management logic...
return <div>...</div>
}
// ✅ After: Extract to custom hook
// hooks/use-model-config.ts
export const useModelConfig = (appId: string) => {
const [modelConfig, setModelConfig] = useState<ModelConfig>(...)
const [completionParams, setCompletionParams] = useState<FormValue>({})
// Related state management logic here
return { modelConfig, setModelConfig, completionParams, setCompletionParams }
}
// Component becomes cleaner
const Configuration: FC = () => {
const { modelConfig, setModelConfig } = useModelConfig(appId)
return <div>...</div>
}
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 484 lines · 93 tokens per session scan A c9305b49807a
component-refactoring is a skill published in the GitHub repository Ohh-889/skyroc (797 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 93 tokens to every session and 3,490 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
antd
Use when the user's task involves Ant Design (antd) — writing antd components, debugging antd issues, querying antd APIs/props/tokens/demos, migrating between antd versions, or analyzing antd usage in a project. Triggers on antd-related code, imports from 'antd', or explicit antd questions.
pro-upgrade
An upgrade guide for projects built with Ant Design Pro, a React-based application template for business software. It compares the project with the latest official template and merges framework updates while preserving application code.
next-cache-components-optimizer
Optimize the meaningful UI available immediately from a Next.js route on an initial load (hard navigation) or named client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route and entry point at a time; the shipped test then guards…
next-partial-prefetching-optimizer
Optimize what selected Next.js client navigations include before the click under Partial Prefetching. Use after Cache Components and Partial Prefetching are adopted when the user wants selected URL-specific UI to be instant, wants reusable content to wait for navigation, or needs to choose between default, viewport…
server-side-calls
Call tRPC procedures directly from server code using t.createCallerFactory() and router.createCaller(context) for integration testing, internal server logic, and custom API endpoints. Catch TRPCError and extract HTTP status with getHTTPStatusCodeFromError(). Error handling via onError option.
compiler-port
Port a compiler pass from TypeScript to Rust. Gathers context, plans the port, implements in a subagent with test-fix loop, then reviews.