Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ohong/agent-skills --skill startgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ohong/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ohong/agent-skills/start)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ohong/agent-skills/start"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ohong/agent-skills/start/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ohong/agent-skills/start"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ohong/agent-skills/start.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00980 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00392 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00196 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00098 |
Grade A, and why
start scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 82 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Mission Start — Enter the OODA Cycle
You are beginning execution. Each milestone is its own OODA cycle: orient to the milestone, act on it, observe the results, reorient for the next.
Pre-flight: Orient to the mission
-
Check that
.mission/plan.mdexists. If not: "No mission plan found. Run/mission:plan <task>first." Stop. -
Check that
.mission/progress.mdexists. If not: "No progress file found. Run/mission:plan <task>first." Stop. -
Read
.mission/plan.md— load the full plan into your orientation. -
Read
.mission/progress.md— if milestones are already done, ask: "Previous progress detected. Resume with/mission:continue, or restart from milestone 1?" -
Mismatch check: Read the plan's build/test/lint commands and run them once. Do they work? If not, fix the environment before starting. Starting with a broken environment means every observation will be contaminated.
Execution: The Milestone OODA Loop
Follow the execution protocol in ../../references/execution-protocol.md starting from Milestone 1.
Each milestone follows the OODA cycle:
Orient
- Re-read
.mission/plan.mdfor this milestone's goal and acceptance criteria - Re-read
.mission/progress.mdfor current state - Read the source files you'll be modifying — never edit from memory
- If
.mission/learnings.mdexists, check for relevant patterns
Decide (or act implicitly)
- Familiar pattern? Act directly. Standard CRUD, common test setup, well-known library usage — move with implicit guidance.
- Novel situation? Deliberate explicitly. Unfamiliar architecture, unexpected file structure, complex integration — slow down, read the relevant code, and think before acting.
Act
- Write code, staying scoped to THIS milestone only
- Commit after each meaningful change:
mission(N/total): {description} - Every action is a hypothesis: "I believe this change will make the acceptance criteria pass"
Observe
- Run ALL acceptance criteria. This is reality speaking to you — listen.
- If they pass: update progress, proceed to next milestone
- If they fail: you have a mismatch. Reorient before retrying. See failure recovery below.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 82 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A bcbb47c55e50
start is a skill published in the GitHub repository ohong/agent-skills (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 980 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
story-readiness
Checks whether a story is ready to implement: clear acceptance criteria, no open questions, valid ADR and dependencies. Use when the user asks if a story, or the sprint's stories, are ready to start or build.
recipe-create-meet-space
Create a Google Meet meeting space and share the join link.
workthreads
SpecStory Workthreads - a weekly work-thread rollup across a team's repos from SpecStory coding histories (any agent - Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and more). It groups the window's sessions into threads of work per project and labels each new / open / recently closed, so a lead sees what shipped, what is still…
atmos-config
Atmos root configuration: atmos.yaml discovery, precedence, deep merging, basepath, imports, minimal bootstrap, and routing to narrower Atmos skills.
projects
List all managed projects with status, branch, open PRs, and open issue counts — portfolio-level view.
handle-linkedin-connection-request-signal
Use this skill when someone sends a team member an inbound LinkedIn connection request. An inbound request is a deliberate, ACTIVE first-party intent signal — meaningfully stronger than a passive profile view — and it deserves different scoring rules. The skill resolves and enriches the requester, gates them through…