Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to okfriansyah-moh/ares. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/okfriansyah-moh/ares/main/.ai/skills/architecture-management/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/okfriansyah-moh/aresWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/okfriansyah-moh/ares/architecture-management)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/okfriansyah-moh/ares/architecture-management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/okfriansyah-moh/ares/architecture-management/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/okfriansyah-moh/ares/architecture-management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/okfriansyah-moh/ares/architecture-management.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00310 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00155 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00062 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
architecture-management scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Architecture Management
Purpose
Create, review, and evolve repository or system architecture with clear decisions and explicit tradeoffs.
Responsibilities
- Define system boundaries, major components, interfaces, and dependencies.
- Keep architecture aligned with current implementation and stated requirements.
- Record significant decisions as ADRs.
- Detect drift, coupling, and unnecessary complexity.
Principles
- Prefer the simplest design that satisfies the requirement.
- Make decisions explicit, including alternatives and tradeoffs.
- Evolve from the current state before proposing replacement.
- Keep responsibilities and interfaces clear.
Inputs
- Requirements, specs, RFCs, or problem statements.
- Existing architecture documents, ADRs, and relevant code context.
- Constraints such as scale, compliance, integrations, or team boundaries.
Outputs
architecture.mdor an updated architecture section for the repository.- ADRs in
docs/decisions/for material decisions. - Review findings grouped as confirmed, drift, gaps, and recommendations.
Usage Guidance
- Read the current architecture before proposing change.
- Describe each component in one clear responsibility statement.
- Justify external dependencies and identify coupling risks.
- Write an ADR when a decision changes structure, contracts, or operating assumptions.
References
references/adr-guidelines.mdfor ADR structure, status handling, and decision quality checks.references/tradeoff-analysis.mdfor comparing options and documenting tradeoffs clearly.references/architecture-review.mdfor review criteria, drift detection, and reporting format.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 38 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A d81351c7c633
architecture-management is a skill published in the GitHub repository okfriansyah-moh/ares (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 310 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
antigravity-cli
Delegate bounded investigation, review, or implementation tasks to Antigravity CLI from a supervising agent. Includes a background client for task progress, follow-up prompts, conversation recovery, cancellation, and visible failures.
grok-cli
Delegate bounded tasks to Grok Build from a supervising agent such as Codex. Use when the user asks Grok to investigate, review, implement, or provide another perspective, or when a distinct coding agent would materially help. Includes a background ACP client for progress, follow-up prompts, permissions, and…
ux-writing
Judgment rules for user-facing text and docs: CLI and diagnostic output, error and help text, README and docs structure, code comments, titles, and generated reports, decks, or exports. Use when writing or changing any user-visible string, when adding or restructuring docs or deciding which page owns a fact, when a…
talk-like-scarletkc
A writing guide that makes text sound like the developer scarletkc, including posts, comments, technical opinions, project documents, and translations.
product-writing
Write, edit, or review UI copy, CLI messages, help text, code comments, and technical documentation covering product behavior, errors, status, setup, compatibility, or technical results.
marketing-copy
Write outbound promotional copy for a product or project: launch and update posts for community platforms and social media, store page descriptions and short blurbs, landing page headlines and calls to action, press-style announcements, and the naming of a product for another language or market. Covers what may be…