Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add OKHP3/skillz --skill agent-supply-chaingit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OKHP3/skillzWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/okhp3/skillz/agent-supply-chain)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/okhp3/skillz/agent-supply-chain"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/okhp3/skillz/agent-supply-chain/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/okhp3/skillz/agent-supply-chain"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/okhp3/skillz/agent-supply-chain.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00119 | $0.02524 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00060 | $0.01262 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00505 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00252 |
Grade A, and why
agent-supply-chain scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to agent-supply-chain — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 340 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent Supply Chain Integrity
Generate and verify integrity manifests for AI agent plugins and tools. Detect tampering, enforce version pinning, and establish supply chain provenance.
Overview
Agent plugins and MCP servers have the same supply chain risks as npm packages or container images — except the ecosystem has no equivalent of npm provenance, Sigstore, or SLSA. This skill fills that gap.
Plugin Directory → Hash All Files (SHA-256) → Generate INTEGRITY.json
↓
Later: Plugin Directory → Re-Hash Files → Compare Against INTEGRITY.json
↓
Match? VERIFIED : TAMPERED
When to Use
- Before promoting a plugin from development to production
- During code review of plugin PRs
- As a CI step to verify no files were modified after review
- When auditing third-party agent tools or MCP servers
- Building a plugin marketplace with integrity requirements
Pattern 1: Generate Integrity Manifest
Create a deterministic INTEGRITY.json with SHA-256 hashes of all plugin files.
import hashlib
import json
from datetime import datetime, timezone
from pathlib import Path
EXCLUDE_DIRS = {".git", "__pycache__", "node_modules", ".venv", ".pytest_cache"}
EXCLUDE_FILES = {".DS_Store", "Thumbs.db", "INTEGRITY.json"}
def hash_file(path: Path) -> str:
"""Compute SHA-256 hex digest of a file."""
h = hashlib.sha256()
with open(path, "rb") as f:
for chunk in iter(lambda: f.read(8192), b""):
h.update(chunk)
return h.hexdigest()
def generate_manifest(plugin_dir: str) -> dict:
"""Generate an integrity manifest for a plugin directory."""
root = Path(plugin_dir)
files = {}
for path in sorted(root.rglob("*")):
if not path.is_file():
continue
if path.name in EXCLUDE_FILES:
continue
if any(part in EXCLUDE_DIRS for part in path.relative_to(root).parts):
continue
rel = path.relative_to(root).as_posix()
files[rel] = hash_file(path)
# Chain hash: SHA-256 of all file hashes concatenated in sorted order
chain = hashlib.sha256()
for key in sorted(files.keys()):
chain.update(files[key].encode("ascii"))
manifest = {
"plugin_name": root.name,
"generated_at": datetime.now(timezone.utc).isoformat(),
"algorithm": "sha256",
"file_count": len(files),
"files": files,
"manifest_hash": chain.hexdigest(),
}
return manifest
# Generate and save
manifest = generate_manifest("my-plugin/")
Path("my-plugin/INTEGRITY.json").write_text(
json.dumps(manifest, indent=2) + "\n"
)
print(f"Generated manifest: {manifest['file_count']} files, "
f"hash: {manifest['manifest_hash'][:16]}...")
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 340 lines · 119 tokens per session scan A 5b678338dca4
agent-supply-chain is a skill published in the GitHub repository OKHP3/skillz (3 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 119 tokens to every session and 2,524 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to agent-supply-chain, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
vastai-sdk
Vast.ai Python SDK — high-level API for GPU instances, volumes, serverless endpoints, and billing.
pm-aarrr
A post-launch product-growth workflow based on AARRR: acquiring users, activating them, retaining them, earning revenue, and gaining referrals.
pm-docs
A workflow for producing product documents such as PRDs, BRDs, and MRDs. These are structured documents describing what a product needs, its business case, and its market.
pm-position
A guided process for defining a product’s market position, value, audience, competitive difference, business model, pricing, and revenue plan. The instructions are written mainly in Chinese.
pm-retro
A retrospective workflow for reviewing a finished agile iteration, recording what happened, and choosing improvements for the next cycle.
product-marketing-copywriter
A marketing-copy tool that analyzes audience problems and product benefits, then creates promotional headlines and body text. Marketing copy is writing intended to explain and promote a product.