Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add OKHP3/skillz --skill breakdown-testgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OKHP3/skillzWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/okhp3/skillz/breakdown-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/okhp3/skillz/breakdown-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/okhp3/skillz/breakdown-test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/okhp3/skillz/breakdown-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/okhp3/skillz/breakdown-test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.03197 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.01279 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00639 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00320 |
Grade A, and why
breakdown-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to breakdown-test — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 366 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Planning & Quality Assurance Prompt
Goal
Act as a senior Quality Assurance Engineer and Test Architect with expertise in ISTQB frameworks, ISO 25010 quality standards, and modern testing practices. Your task is to take feature artifacts (PRD, technical breakdown, implementation plan) and generate comprehensive test planning, task breakdown, and quality assurance documentation for GitHub project management.
Quality Standards Framework
ISTQB Framework Application
- Test Process Activities: Planning, monitoring, analysis, design, implementation, execution, completion
- Test Design Techniques: Black-box, white-box, and experience-based testing approaches
- Test Types: Functional, non-functional, structural, and change-related testing
- Risk-Based Testing: Risk assessment and mitigation strategies
ISO 25010 Quality Model
- Quality Characteristics: Functional suitability, performance efficiency, compatibility, usability, reliability, security, maintainability, portability
- Quality Validation: Measurement and assessment approaches for each characteristic
- Quality Gates: Entry and exit criteria for quality checkpoints
Input Requirements
Before using this prompt, ensure you have:
Core Feature Documents
- Feature PRD:
/docs/ways-of-work/plan/{epic-name}/{feature-name}.md - Technical Breakdown:
/docs/ways-of-work/plan/{epic-name}/{feature-name}/technical-breakdown.md - Implementation Plan:
/docs/ways-of-work/plan/{epic-name}/{feature-name}/implementation-plan.md - GitHub Project Plan:
/docs/ways-of-work/plan/{epic-name}/{feature-name}/project-plan.md
Output Format
Create comprehensive test planning documentation:
- Test Strategy:
/docs/ways-of-work/plan/{epic-name}/{feature-name}/test-strategy.md - Test Issues Checklist:
/docs/ways-of-work/plan/{epic-name}/{feature-name}/test-issues-checklist.md - Quality Assurance Plan:
/docs/ways-of-work/plan/{epic-name}/{feature-name}/qa-plan.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 366 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 83727ec30a98
breakdown-test is a skill published in the GitHub repository OKHP3/skillz (3 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 3,197 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to breakdown-test, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
kelly-agent-eval
Review board (Busabase App-in-Skill) that runs a fixed suite of mock test cases against a baseline vs candidate agent version and surfaces rubric-scored regressions before a release. Use when the user invokes $kelly-agent-eval or /kelly-agent-eval, wants to review agent-version regressions, compare baseline vs…
kelly-app-skill-creator-tests
Build, maintain, and run conformance tests for canonical App-in-Skill projects created by kelly-app-skill-creator. Use when a Kelly app skill needs contract checks, local server smoke tests, responsive browser acceptance, temporary open-source Busabase integration, environment-gated Busabase Cloud OAuth verification…
pentest-api-attacker
Test APIs against OWASP API Security Top 10 including discovery, auth abuse, and protocol-specific checks.
pentest-container-k8s
Test Docker and Kubernetes security controls for RBAC abuse, breakout, and secret exposure.
pentest-remediation-validator
Retest remediated findings, detect regressions, and generate remediation status and certification artifacts.
pentest-vuln-analyzer
Correlate scanner results with CVE and exploit intelligence and prioritize by CVSS and exploitability.